Cited by 438Innovation and Knowledge ManagementFirm Innovation and GrowthBusiness Strategies and Innovation

The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage Theory

Open access
Suarez, Fernando F., Lanzolla, Gianvito·2007·Academy of Management Review

Abstract

We advance first mover advantage (FMA) theory by examining how the pace of market evolution and technology evolution potentially enables or disables FMA. Integrating several streams of literature, we elaborate on the interplay among these two environmental (macro) conditions and the “isolating mechanisms” that underpin FMA. We model these dynamics to help researchers negotiate the current debate, arising from conflicting empirical evidence, on the conditions necessary for FMA to exist.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2007.24349587

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rapidly growing market demand allows late entrants to acquire customers and expand their installed base on a platform without directly competing with existing complementors.

    “Rapidly growing market demand also allows late entrants to acquire customers and expand their installed base on a platform without directly competing with the existing complementors (Suarez and Lanzolla 2007).”

    From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Suarez and Lanzolla 2007

  • Complementors that enter a platform market at an early stage are likely to face a high risk of failure.

    “Following the extant literature on entry timing in fast-cycle industries (Bohlmann et al. 2002;Suarez and Lanzolla 2007), complementors that enter a platform market at an early stage are likely to face a high risk of failure.”

    From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Suarez and Lanzolla 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suarez, F. F., & Lanzolla, G.
Affiliations
  • Boston University
  • City, University of London (GB)
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Published
2007-04
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
377-392
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
OpenAlex
W2114469794
Cited by
438
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 21
FWCI
61.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
Keywords
first-mover advantage, market evolution, technological evolution, environmental dynamics, reproductive barriers, market leadership, competitive advantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review