Cited by 168Organizational Learning and LeadershipInnovative Education and Learning PracticesManagement and Organizational Studies

Deutero-Learning in Organizations: A Review and a Reformulation

Open access
Visser, Max·2007·Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Higher-order learning in and by organizations is often conceptualized in the literature as deutero-learning. However, current definitions and descriptions of this concept suffer from conceptual confusion and terminological ambiguity, impeding a proper theoretical understanding and hindering empirical research. Following Bateson and Argyris and Schön, I reformulate the concept of deutero-learning as the behavioral adaptation to patterns of conditioning in relationships in organizational contexts, distinguishing it from meta-learning and planned learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2007.24351883

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall change can only be achieved by higher-level learning, which results in the development of new norms, values, and practices.

    “Overall change can only be achieved by higher-level learning (e.g., Fiol and Lyles 1985)-also called second-order learning (e.g., Sørensen 2002) or deutero learning (e.g., Visser 2007)-which results in the development of new norms, values, and practices.”

    From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Visser 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Visser, M.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Visser, Max
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Published
2007-04
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
659-667
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
OpenAlex
W2149548894
Cited by
168
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
18.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
higher-order learning, organizational learning, meta-learning, behavioral adaptation, conditioning, organizational relationships, conceptual reformulation, terminological ambiguity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review