Cited by 884Management and Organizational StudiesOrganizational Management and LeadershipInnovation and Knowledge Management

ORGANIZATIONAL PATH DEPENDENCE: OPENING THE BLACK BOX.

SYDOW, JÖRG, SCHREYÖGG, GEORG, KOCH, JOCHEN·2009·Academy of Management Review

Abstract

To enable a better understanding of the underlying logic of path dependence, we set forth a theoretical framework explaining how organizations become path dependent. At its core are the dynamics of self-reinforcing mechanisms, which are likely to lead an organization into a lock-in. By drawing on studies of technological paths, we conceptualize the emergent process of path dependence along three distinct stages. We also use the model to explore breakouts from organizational path dependence and discuss implications for managing and researching organizational paths. The discourse on organizational innovation and change has become more complex. On the one hand, there is an ever-increasing demand for more flexible or even fluid “new ” organiza-tional forms. On the other hand, studies stress-ing organizational inertia and the historical im-printing of decision making (“history matters”) have come to the fore in management and or-

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2009.44885978

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The market for scholarly journals developed a path dependence on the dominant market position of a few large publishers and the restrictively licensed subscription business model.

    “As a result of the change in market structure as well as scientific evaluation practices for individual research performance, a ' path dependence ' (Dobusch & Schüssler 2013; Sydow et al. 2009) developed on the dominant market position of a few large publishers and the restrictively licensed -and thus much restricted access -subscription business model they were pushing.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SYDOW, J., SCHREYÖGG, G., & KOCH, J.
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Published
2009-10-01
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
689-709
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4245098948
Cited by
884
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 46
FWCI
57.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
self-reinforcing mechanisms, lock-in, organizational inertia, organizational change, organizational innovation, organizational forms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review