The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward Reimagining Strategy Research: Retrospection and Prospection on the 2011 AMR Decade Award Article
Abstract
We focus on implications of an agreed upon yet little considered conclusion from our 2001 article—that resource value is determined outside the business-level resource-based view. Starting with this premise, we argue that knowledge accumulation from strategy research—especially actionable knowledge about effective versus ineffective managerial judgments—would be stimulated with more balanced attention not only to value capture for the firm but also to value creation for the firm's customers and, ultimately, consumers. To spur such wider attention, we offer an expanded boundary model that includes the demand side, business models, and business ecosystems within the strategy research “umbrella.” Our proposal (1) extends what the current scholarly consensus might consider “normal” strategy research, (2) sets specific boundaries to guide future research, and (3) brings value creation for consumers to a more central position in the field. Viewing strategy from this broader perspective requires a shift in mindset, from focusing primarily on the firm to focusing more equally on the consumer, and from a primary emphasis on value capture to an equal emphasis on value creation. Such a shift faces obstacles but likely would spur innovative knowledge generation and result in a more dynamic, yet accumulative and prescriptive, strategy field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.397 · Cited by 1,626
Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field
Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393853 · Cited by 675
Cited by
Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context
Ostrom, A. L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D. E., Patrício, L., & Voss, C. A. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670515576315 · Cited by 1,469
Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends
Gomes, L. A. D. V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009 · Cited by 836
Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0869 · Cited by 567
The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value
Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0178 · Cited by 540
New games, new rules: big data and the changing context of strategy
Constantiou, I. D., & Kallinikos, J. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2014.17 · Cited by 526
Metadata
- Authors
- Priem, R. L., Butler, J. E., & Li, S.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 471-489
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W2142500467
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 43.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Reimagining Strategy Research: Retrospection and Prospection on the 2011 AMR Decade Award Article. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amr.2013.0097
- The paper
- Priem, R. L., Butler, J. E., & Li, S. (2013). Toward Reimagining Strategy Research: Retrospection and Prospection on the 2011 AMR Decade Award Article. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.