Cited by 567Digital Platforms and EconomicsInnovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and Innovation

Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High

Open access
Dattée, Brice, Alexy, Oliver, Autio, Erkko·2018·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

Innovation ecosystems are increasingly regarded as important vehicles to create and capture value from complex value propositions. While current literature assumes these value propositions can be known ex ante and an appropriate ecosystem design derived from them, we focus on generative technological innovations that enable an unbounded range of potential value propositions, hence offering no clear guidance to firms. To illustrate our arguments, we inductively study two organizations, each attempting to create two novel ecosystems around new technological enablers deep in their industry architecture. We highlight how ecosystem creation in such conditions is a systemic process driven by coupled feedback loops, which organizations must try to control dynamically: firms first make the switch to creating the ecosystem, following an external pull to narrow down the range of potential applications; then need to learn to keep up with ecosystem dynamics by roadmapping and preempting, while simultaneously enacting resonance. Dynamic control further entails counteracting the drifting away of the nascent ecosystem from the firm’s idea of future value creation and the sliding of its intended control points for value capture. Our findings shed new light on strategy and control in emerging ecosystems, and provide guidance to managers on playing the ecosystem game.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2015.0869

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E.
Affiliations
  • Emlyon Business School
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Tilburg University (NL)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2018-04
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
466-498
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2613702260
Cited by
567
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
FWCI
46.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GR/R95371/01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
Keywords
innovation ecosystems, value proposition, uncertainty, dynamic control, roadmapping, preemptive strategy, resonance, value capture, ecosystem design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review