The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies
Abstract
Social exchange theory is one of the most prominent conceptual perspectives in management, as well as related fields like sociology and social psychology. An important criticism of social exchange theory; however, is that it lacks sufficient theoretical precision, and thus has limited utility. Scholars who apply social exchange theory are able to explain many social phenomena in post hoc manner but are severely limited in their ability to make useful a priori predictions regarding workplace behavior. In this review, we discuss social exchange theory as it exists today and identify four critical issues within the social exchange paradigm that warrant additional consideration. The four concerns, around which we center this review, include the following: (1) overlapping constructs that need to be more clearly distinguished; (2) insufficient appreciation to the positive or negative hedonic value of these various constructs; (3) an assumption of bipolarity, which treats negative constructs (e.g., abuse) as the absence of positive constructs (e.g., support); and, following from the prior three issues, (4) theoretically imprecise behavioral predictions. Given that these problems are inherent in the current unidimensional framework for social exchange theory, we suggest an additional dimension–activity. We explain how conceptualizing social exchange within a two-dimensional space, while giving equal consideration to both hedonic value and activity, creates new opportunities for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305279602 · Cited by 10,068
Self-citationPerceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578601 · Cited by 4,163
Consequences of abusive supervision.
Tepper, B. J. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556375 · Cited by 3,810
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909 · Cited by 2,606
Cited by
Ethical leadership: Mapping the terrain for concept cleanup and a future research agenda
Banks, G. C., Fischer, T., Gooty, J., & Stock, G. (2021) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101471 · Cited by 260
A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship
Legood, A., van der Werff, L., Lee, A., & Den Hartog, D. (2021) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2020.1819241 · Cited by 241
Yao, Z., Zhang, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, L., & Luo, J. (2019) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-11-2018-0747 · Cited by 68
Liborius, P., & Kiewitz, C. (2022) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103719 · Cited by 60
Beyond relationship quality: The role of leader–member exchange importance in leader–follower dyads
Lee, A., Thomas, G., Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., & Marstand, A. F. (2019) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12262 · Cited by 60
Leader humility and knowledge sharing intention: a serial mediation model
Nguyen, D. T. N., Teo, S. T. T., Halvorsen, B., & Staples, W. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560704 · Cited by 44
Social exchange theory in leadership research: A problematizing review
Madison, K., Eva, N., De Cieri, H., & Goh, Z. (2025) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2025.101924 · Cited by 22
Research on the Effect of Narcissistic Leadership on Employee Job Embeddedness
Wang, H., Jiao, R., & Li, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927529 · Cited by 20
Transitioning to artificial intelligence-based key account management: A critical assessment
Prior, D. D., & Marcos-Cuevas, J. (2025) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.02.009 · Cited by 18
İçsel pazarlamanın yaratıcı çalışan performansı üzerindeki etkisinde narsist liderliğin rolü
KAYNAK, İ., AKILLIBAŞ, E., & ÇİÇEK, B. (2022) · Business & Management Studies: An International Journal · doi:10.15295/bmij.v10i2.2014 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Annals
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 479-516
- ISSN
- 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-6520
- OpenAlex
- W2580080876
- Cited by
- 2,049
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 178.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
