Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementPublic Policy and Administration Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HOW PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CAN HELP SOCIETIES ACHIEVE SDGs: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Open access
Department of Procurement and Supply Management, College of Business Education, Mwanza, Tanzania, MESHACK, Siwandeti, LETICIA, Mahuwi, Department of Procurement and Supply Management, College of Business Education, Mwanza, Tanzania, BARAKA, Israel, Department of Procurement and Supply Management, College of Business Education, Mwanza, Tanzania·2023·Management of Sustainable Development
DOI 10.54989/msd-2023-0006
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study draws attention to how public procurement adds value and contributes to the achievement of the United Nation’s sustainable development goals (UN SDGs) based on an extensive literature review. A total of 29 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2015-2022 with a focus on sustainable public procurement (SPP) practices and SDGs were retrieved from the Web of Science and Emerald databases for analysis. From the reviewed articles, we develop a conceptual model for better illustration and understanding of the link between SPP practices and SDGs. The model indicates that the achievement of SGDs can be influenced by four dimensions, namely: the underlying principles of SPP, the fundamental practices of SPP principles, the drivers of SPP principles, and the perceived roles of SPP practices which are aligned with the targets of UN SDGs. The analysis of the study revealed that SPP can impact up to 70% (12 out of 17) of UN SDGs. It is established that pubic procurement performs important functions in a diligent manner which adds value and delivers core services to societies, thus supporting the achievement of SDGs. Individual commitment and political will, strong enforcement and control mechanisms, continuous monitoring and assessment of the target areas, and offering inclusive solutions and shared visions among actors are identified as the drivers for building resilience in SPP and achievement of SDGs. The developed model could serve as a basis for identifying the deficiencies in SPP and achievement of SDGs for policy implications, reform, and future research domains.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.54989/msd-2023-0006

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Review and articles selection process (Adopted from Moher et al., 2009).
Figure 1 Review and articles selection process (Adopted from Moher et al., 2009).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Distribution of publications per year (2015 -2022, n = 29)
Figure 2 Distribution of publications per year (2015 -2022, n = 29)CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Most research areas pertaining to SPP and SDGs.
Figure 3 Most research areas pertaining to SPP and SDGs.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Conceptual of model for SPP and SDGs.
Figure 4 Conceptual of model for SPP and SDGs.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Agarchand, N. and Laishram, B. (2017). Sustainable infrastructure development challenges through PPP procurement process: Indian perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp.642-662.
  2. Guarnieri, P. and Gomes, R.C. (2019). Can public procurement be strategic? A future agenda propositions. Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp.295-321.
  3. Patil, N.A. and Laishram, B.S. (2016). Sustainability of Indian PPP procurement process: Development of strategies for enhancement. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 6 No. 5, pp.491-507.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Department of Procurement and Supply Management, C. O. B. E., MESHACK, S., LETICIA, M., Department of Procurement and Supply Management, C. O. B. E., BARAKA, I., & Department of Procurement and Supply Management, C. O. B. E.
Venue
Management of Sustainable Development
Publisher
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
Published
2023-06-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
36-46
ISSN
  • 2066-9380 (ISSN-L)
  • 2247-0220
DOI
10.54989/msd-2023-0006
OpenAlex
W4384834102
Cited by
13
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Management of Sustainable Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
sustainable public procurement, Sustainable Development Goals, SDG achievement, conceptual model, political will, monitoring and assessment, resilience, public sector sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.