CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Corporate Finance and GovernanceCorporate Insolvency and GovernanceCorporate Governance and Financial Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Corporate Governance and Involuntary Delisting: Empirical Evidence from China

Open access
Malik, Muhammad Nasir, Xinping, Xia, Shabbir, Rizwan·2014·International Journal of Economics and Finance
DOI 10.5539/ijef.v6n6p247
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the change in corporate governance structure of a firm in China as it approaches involuntary delisting. To this end, we try to identify corporate governance characteristics that have the most significant impact on probability of involuntary delisting at three years prior to the event, two years prior to the event, and one year prior to the event. The corporate governance characteristics examined in this study are board characteristics (board activity, board size, board independence, and presence of audit committee) and ownership characteristics (shareholder activism, ownership concentration, and insider ownership). We use logistic regression analysis on a match pair sample of surviving and delisting firms and evaluate how the governance characteristics vary over time for the two sets of firms. Our results confirm a widening gap between governance structures of delisting and surviving firms as the former approach delisting event.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5539/ijef.v6n6p247

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1989). The analysis of binary data (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Malik, M. N., Xinping, X., & Shabbir, R.
Affiliations
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Economics and Finance
Publisher
Canadian Center of Science and Education
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
6
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1916-971X (ISSN-L)
  • 1916-9728
DOI
10.5539/ijef.v6n6p247
OpenAlex
W2122050599
Cited by
8
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Journal of Economics and Finance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Law › Corporate Insolvency and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
Keywords
corporate governance, board characteristics, board independence, board size, board activity, audit committee, ownership concentration, shareholder activism, managerial ownership, Chinese listed companies, delisting risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review