Cited by 16Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsDental Radiography and Imaging

WAVELET ANALYSIS AND NEURAL NETWORK CLASSIFIERS TO DETECT MID-SAGITTAL SECTIONS FOR NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT

Open access
Sciortino, Giuseppa, Orlandi, Emanuela, Valenti, Cesare, Tegolo, Domenico·2016·Image Analysis & Stereology

Abstract

We propose a methodology to support the physician in the automatic identification of mid-sagittal sections of the fetus in ultrasound videos acquired during the first trimester of pregnancy. A good mid-sagittal section is a key requirement to make the correct measurement of nuchal translucency which is one of the main marker for screening of chromosomal defects such as trisomy 13, 18 and 21. NT measurement is beyond the scope of this article. The proposed methodology is mainly based on wavelet analysis and neural network classifiers to detect the jawbone and on radial symmetry analysis to detect the choroid plexus. Those steps allow to identify the frames which represent correct mid-sagittal sections to be processed. The performance of the proposed methodology was analyzed on 3000 random frames uniformly extracted from 10 real clinical ultrasound videos. With respect to a ground-truth provided by an expert physician, we obtained a true positive, a true negative and a balanced accuracy equal to 87.26%, 94.98% and 91.12% respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5566/ias.1352

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three studies focused on detection of the midsagittal plane of the fetus, with one study focusing on 2D ultrasound and two studies on 3D ultrasound.

    “Three studies focused on the detection of the midsagittal plane of the fetus, with one study focusing on 2D ultrasound 19 and two studies on 3D ultrasound.20,21”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jain R, Kasturi R, Schunck B (1995). Machine Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sciortino, G., Orlandi, E., Valenti, C., & Tegolo, D.
Affiliations
University of Palermo (IT)
Venue
Image Analysis & Stereology
Published
2016-04-14
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
105
ISSN
  • 1580-3139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1854-5165
OpenAlex
W2335957243
Cited by
16
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Image Analysis & Stereology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
Keywords
nuchal translucency, prenatal ultrasound, first trimester, wavelet analysis, neural network classifier, trisomy screening, chromosomal abnormalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review