Cited by 22Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Portable digital X-ray for TB pre-diagnosis screening in rural communities in Nigeria

Open access
Odume, B., Chukwu, E., Fawole, T., Nwokoye, N., Ogbudebe, C., Chukwuogo, O., Useni, S., Dim, C. +6 more·2022·Public Health Action

Abstract

SETTING: This pilot project was conducted in hard-to-reach communities of two Niger Delta States in the South-South Region of Nigeria. OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of portable digital X-ray, the Delft-Light Backpack (DLB) for TB active case-finding (ACF) in hard-to-reach Niger Delta communities using the WHO 3B TB screening/diagnosis algorithm. DESIGN: DLB X-ray was used to screen all consenting eligible participants during community TB screening out-reaches in all hard-to-reach communities of Akwa Ibom and Cross River States in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Participants with a CAD4TB (computer-aided detection for TB score) 60 had Xpert (sputum) and/or clinical (radiograph) assessment for TB diagnosis. Data from the project were analysed for this study. RESULTS: A total of 8,230 participants (males: 47.2%, females: 52.8%) underwent TB screening and 1,140 (13.9%) presumptive TB cases were identified. The TB prevalence among all participants and among those with presumptive TB were respectively 1.2% and 8.6%. The number needed to screen was 84. Among people with presumptive TB, the proportion of males and females with confirmed TB was respectively 12.0% and 5.6% ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TB screening using DLB X-ray during community-based ACF in hard-to-reach Niger Delta communities of Nigeria showed a high TB prevalence among participants. Nationwide deployment of the instrument in hard-to-reach areas is recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5588/pha.21.0079

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Odume, B., Chukwu, E., Fawole, T., Nwokoye, N., Ogbudebe, C., Chukwuogo, O., Useni, S., Dim, C., Ubochioma, E., Nongo, D., Eneogu, R., Lagundoye Odusote, T., Oyelaran, O., & Anyaike, C.
Affiliations
  • KNCV TB Plus (NL)
  • University of Nigeria (NG)
  • Federal Ministry of Health (NG)
  • United States Agency for International Development (US)
Venue
Public Health Action
Published
2022-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
85-89
ISSN
2220-8372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283396654
Cited by
22
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Public Health Action (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
tuberculosis screening, active case finding, hard-to-reach populations, rural communities, tuberculosis prevalence, number needed to screen, Niger Delta, Akwa Ibom State, Cross River

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review