Cited by 833Political Theory and DemocracyAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The Failure of Presidential Democracy

Linz, Juan·1994·Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.56021/9780801846397

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weak or collapsing democratic political parties open the door to anti-system outsiders who threaten democratic institutions.

    “Weak or collapsing democratic political parties open the door to anti-system outsiders who threaten democratic institutions (Linz 1994; Samuels and Shugart 2010; Carreras 2012; Mainwaring 2018; Self and Hicken 2018).”

    From Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection (2020) · cites this paper as Linz 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linz, J.
Corresponding author
Linz, Juan
Venue
Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks
Published
1994
OpenAlex
W4319588245
Cited by
833
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
38.66
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
presidentialism, democratic theory, executive power, separation of powers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review