Cited by 224Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Open-label add-on treatment trial of minocycline in fragile X syndrome.

Open access
Paribello, Carlo, Tao, Leeping, Folino, Anthony, Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth, Tranfaglia, Michael, Ethell, Iryna M, Ethell, Douglas W·2010·BMC Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a disorder characterized by a variety of disabilities, including cognitive deficits, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other socio-emotional problems. It is hypothesized that the absence of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) leads to higher levels of matrix metallo-proteinase-9 activity (MMP-9) in the brain. Minocycline inhibits MMP-9 activity, and alleviates behavioural and synapse abnormalities in fmr1 knockout mice, an established model for FXS. This open-label add-on pilot trial was conducted to evaluate safety and efficacy of minocycline in treating behavioural abnormalities that occur in humans with FXS. METHODS: Twenty individuals with FXS, ages 13-32, were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg or 200 mg of minocycline daily. Behavioural evaluations were made prior to treatment (baseline) and again 8 weeks after daily minocycline treatment. The primary outcome measure was the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist-Community Edition (ABC-C) Irritability Subscale, and the secondary outcome measures were the other ABC-C subscales, clinical global improvement scale (CGI), and the visual analog scale for behaviour (VAS). Side effects were assessed using an adverse events checklist, a complete blood count (CBC), hepatic and renal function tests, and antinuclear antibody screen (ANA), done at baseline and at 8 weeks. RESULTS: The ABC-C Irritability Subscale scores showed significant improvement (p < 0.001), as did the VAS (p = 0.003) and the CGI (p < 0.001). The only significant treatment-related side effects were minor diarrhea (n = 3) and seroconversion to a positive ANA (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study demonstrate that minocycline provides significant functional benefits to FXS patients and that it is well-tolerated. These findings are consistent with the fmr1 knockout mouse model results, suggesting that minocycline modifies underlying neural defects that account for behavioural abnormalities. A placebo-controlled trial of minocycline in FXS is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Open-Label Trial NCT00858689.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2377-10-91

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduction of MMP-9 levels with minocycline in humans with FXS contributes to reversal of several FXS phenotypes, including behavioral deficits and enhanced auditory electrocortical activity in adults and/or adolescents with FXS.

    “Reduction of MMP-9 levels with minocycline in humans with FXS (Dziembowska et al., 2013) contributes to reversal of several FXS phenotypes, including behavioral deficits and enhanced auditory electrocortical activity in adults and/or adolescents with FXS (Paribello et al., 2010; Leigh et al., 2013; Schneider et al., 2013).”
  • A trial without a control group in adolescent and adult males with FXS reported minocycline was effective on every outcome measure.

    “an open trial in adolescent and adult males with FXS demonstrated efficacy in all of the outcome measures (127).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paribello, C., Tao, L., Folino, A., Berry-Kravis, E., Tranfaglia, M., Ethell, I. M., & Ethell, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Surrey Place Centre (CA)
  • Fraxa Research Foundation (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Paribello, Carlo
Venue
BMC Neurology
Published
2010-10-11
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
91-91
ISSN
1471-2377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153053291
Cited by
223
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 23
FWCI
14.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
FRAXA Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, minocycline, MMP-9, FMRP, behavioural abnormalities, irritability, adjunctive therapy, drug safety, adverse events, antinuclear antibodies, Fmr1 knockout mice
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Enzyme Inhibitors, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Minocycline, Pilot Projects, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review