Cited by 135Sleep and related disordersDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

CBT-I Coach: A Description and Clinician Perceptions of a Mobile App for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia

Open access
Kuhn, Eric, Weiss, Brandon J., Taylor, Katherine L., Hoffman, Julia E., Ramsey, Kelly M., Manber, Rachel, Gehrman, Philip, Crowley, Jill J. +2 more·2016·Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Study objectives This paper describes CBT-I Coach, a patient-facing smartphone app designed to enhance cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). It presents findings of two surveys of U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) CBT-I trained clinicians regarding their perceptions of CBT-I Coach before it was released (n = 138) and use of it two years after it was released (n = 176). Methods VA-trained CBT-I clinicians completed web-based surveys before and two years after CBT-I Coach was publicly released. Results Prior to CBT-I Coach release, clinicians reported that it was moderately to very likely that the app could improve care and a majority (87.0%) intended to use it if it were available. Intention to use the app was predicted by smartphone ownership (β = 0.116, p < 0.05) and perceptions of relative advantage to existing CBT-I practices (β = 0.286, p < 0.01), compatibility with their own needs and values (β = 0.307, p < 0.01), and expectations about the complexity of the app (β = 0.245, p < 0.05). Two years after CBT-I Coach became available, 59.9% of participants reported using it with patients and had favorable impressions of its impact on homework adherence and outcomes. Conclusions Findings suggest that before release, CBT-I Coach was perceived to have potential to enhance CBT-I and address common adherence issues and clinicians would use it. These results are reinforced by findings two years after it was released suggesting robust uptake and favorable perceptions of its value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5664/jcsm.5700

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have shown that those who received Web-based CBTi had improved sleep outcomes.

    “Recent studies have shown that those who received Web-based CBTi had improved sleep outcomes [22-26].”

    From Tamper-Resistant Mobile Health Using Blockchain Technology. (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhn, E., Weiss, B. J., Taylor, K. L., Hoffman, J. E., Ramsey, K. M., Manber, R., Gehrman, P., Crowley, J. J., Ruzek, J. I., & Trockel, M.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kuhn, Eric
Venue
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Published
2016-04-15
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
597-606
ISSN
  • 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9397
OpenAlex
W2279773756
Cited by
135
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6
FWCI
22.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, mobile health apps, mobile application, clinician perceptions, intention to use, technology acceptance, homework adherence, veterans, app uptake
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Veterans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review