Cited by 84Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

MSLT in primary insomnia: stability and relation to nocturnal sleep

Open access
Roehrs, Timothy A., Randall, Surilla, Harris, Erica, Maan, Renee, Roth, Thomas·2011·SLEEP

Abstract

MSLT Stability in Insomnia-Roehrs et alniacs and controls with mean daily sleep latencies of 10.3 vs 8.6 min.15 What is evident in the studies above reporting significant MSLT differences between insomniacs and controls are the differences among the studies in the control sample MSLT mean sleep latencies, which range from 8.6 min to 12.3 min.All these studies used samples of convenience, recruiting their control samples through newspaper advertisements for normal sleepers.To better understand whether the MSLT is elevated in insomniacs it would be valuable to compare insomniacs to a population-based, representative sample of healthy non-insomniacs.The studies of MSLT in insomnia also differ in the definition of insomnia used.Some of the above cited studies defined insomnia based on a single complaint only, others used the standard clinical diagnostic criteria, and others included nocturnal polysomnographic (NPSG) entry criteria.How nocturnal sleep time relates to MSLT in insomnia is an important theoretical question.In studies of healthy normals, short MSLT mean daily sleep latencies are associated with diary-reported short total sleep times and high laboratory sleep efficiencies the night before the MSLT.16 These results suggest that the less the habitual nocturnal sleep, the greater the degree of daytime sleepiness.The question arises as to how sleep time in insomniacs relates to their MSLTs the following day.Finally, the studies of MSLT in insomnia report relatively large standard deviations.The wide variability among insomniacs may reflect high test-retest variability in a given individual's MSLT.No study has assessed the repeatability of MSLT results in insomniacs across time.Will an insomniac with an elevated MSLT show the same elevation across time?In this paper, we report MSLT results of a large sample of insomniacs participating in a chronic pharmacological treatment trial; compare these results to a representative population control sample; evaluate the relation of MSLT to NPSG sleep time; and importantly, assess the stability of the MSLT in insomnia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5665/sleep.1426

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bonnet MH, Arand DL. 24-hour metabolic rate in insomnia and matched normal sleepers. Sleep 1995;18:581-8.
  2. Drake C, Roehrs T, Breslau N, et al. The 10-year risk of verified motor ve- hicle crashes in relation of physiologic sleepiness. Sleep 2010;33:745-52.
  3. Walsh JK, Roth T. Pharmacologic treatment of insomnia: Benzodiazepine receptor agonists. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC. (eds), Principles and practice of sleep medicine. 5 th ed, St Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2011,905-15.
  4. Randall S, Roehrs T, Harris E, Maan R, Roth T. Chronic use of zolpidem is not associated with loss of efficacy. Sleep 2010;33:A221 REFERENCES
  5. Nofzinger E, Nowell P, Buysse D. Towards a neurobiology of sleep dis- turbance in primary insomnia and depression: a comparison of subjective, visually scored and periodic amplitude, and power spectral density sleep measures. Sleep 1999;22:S99.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roehrs, T. A., Randall, S., Harris, E., Maan, R., & Roth, T.
Affiliations
Henry Ford Health (US)
Corresponding author
Roehrs, Timothy A.
Venue
SLEEP
Published
2011-12
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
1647-1652
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2063200548
Cited by
84
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017355)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
multiple sleep latency test, primary insomnia, daytime sleepiness, test-retest stability, sleep latency, nocturnal polysomnography
MeSH terms
Zolpidem, Adult, Arousal, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Pyridines, Sleep, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review