The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increased Prevalence of Insomnia and Changes in Hypnotics Use in England over 15 Years: Analysis of the 1993, 2000, and 2007 National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To investigate changes over 15 years in the prevalence of insomnia and its association with demographic characteristics and hypnotic medication use. DESIGN: Analysis of 3 cross-sectional national mental health surveys carried out in 1993, 2000, and 2007, which used comparable sampling methods and identical insomnia assessments. SETTING: Adults living in private households in England. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: 20,503 people aged 16-64 years. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Insomnia was defined according to 4 different criteria, using relevant questions from the revised Clinical Interview Schedule. Modest increases in insomnia prevalence were found over the survey periods (any symptoms increasing from 35.0% in 1993 to 38.6% in 2007; insomnia diagnosis from 3.1% to 5.8%, respectively). In all 3 surveys, similar strengths of association in relation to all criteria were found, with female gender, increased age, lower educational attainment, depression, unemployment, economic inactivity, and widowed, divorced, or separated status. Prevalence of hypnotic use was double in 2000 (0.8%) compared to 1993 (0.4%); from limited information on selected medications, there was no such increase between 2000 and 2007. The reasons reported for any sleep disturbance over the last month were generally similar across surveys, the most marked change being illness/discomfort increasing as an explanation from 14.3% to 17.4% to 19.0%. CONCLUSIONS: In the English general population, insomnia (by any definition) showed a modest but steady increase in prevalence over a 15-year period. Strengths of associations with demographic factors and self-reported reasons for sleep disturbance remained reasonably stable over this period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Epidemiology of insomnia: what we know and what we still need to learn
Ohayon, M. M. (2002) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1053/smrv.2002.0186 · Cited by 3,743
Participation Rates in Epidemiologic Studies
Galea, S., & Tracy, M. (2007) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013 · Cited by 1,877
Lewis, G., Pelosi, A. J., Araya, R., & Dunn, G. (1992) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700030415 · Cited by 1,487
Epidemiology of Insomnia: a Longitudinal Study in a UK Population
(2007) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/30.3.274 · Cited by 583 · cited 1×
“Four different definitions of insomnia were used, and the prevalences reported here are consistent with previous research 2,4,12 and the reference ranges summarized in Ohayon’s overview 7 of epidemiological research in this field.”
MethodThe Natural History of Insomnia: A Population-Based 3-Year Longitudinal Study
Morin, C. M., Bélanger, L., LeBlanc, M., Ivers, H., Savard, J., Espie, C. A., Mérette, C., Baillargeon, L., & Grégoire, J.-P. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.610 · Cited by 498
Evaluation of Chronic Insomnia
Sateia, M. J., Doghramji, K., Hauri, P. J., & Morin, C. M. (2000) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/23.2.1l · Cited by 466
Trends in service use and treatment for mental disorders in adults throughout Great Britain
Brugha, T. S., Bebbington, P. E., Singleton, N., Melzer, D., Jenkins, R., Lewis, G., Farrell, M., Bhugra, D., Lee, A., & Meltzer, H. (2004) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.185.5.378 · Cited by 114
Self-citation
Cited by
European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia
Riemann, D., Baglioni, C., Bassetti, C., Bjorvatn, B., Dolenc Groselj, L., Ellis, J. G., Espie, C. A., Garcia‐Borreguero, D., Gjerstad, M., Gonçalves, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.12594 · Cited by 2,049
Jorm, A. F., Patten, S. B., Brugha, T. S., & Mojtabai, R. (2017) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20388 · Cited by 556
Self-citationBrain mechanisms of insomnia: new perspectives on causes and consequences
Van Someren, E. J. W. (2021) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00046.2019 · Cited by 543
The prevalence of insomnia in the general population in China: A meta-analysis
Cao, X.-L., Wang, S.-B., Zhong, B.-L., Zhang, L., Ungvari, G. S., Ng, C. H., Li, L., Chiu, H. F. K., Lok, G. K. I., Lu, J.-P., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170772 · Cited by 409
Trends in insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness among US adults from 2002 to 2012
Ford, E. S., Cunningham, T. J., Giles, W. H., & Croft, J. B. (2015) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2014.12.008 · Cited by 332
“In England, insomnia symptoms, insomnia of at least moderate severity, insomnia and fatigue, and insomnia diagnosis among survey participants aged 16– 64 years increased by 6%, 5%, 4%, and 3%, respectively, from 1993 to 2007 [26].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Calem, M., Bisla, J., Begum, A., Dewey, M., Bebbington, P. E., Brugha, T., Cooper, C., Jenkins, R., Lindesay, J., McManus, S., Meltzer, H., Spiers, N., Weich, S., & Stewart, R.
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 377-384
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- OpenAlex
- W2077227006
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 13.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Prevalence of Insomnia and Changes in Hypnotics Use in England over 15 Years: Analysis of the 1993, 2000, and 2007 National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5665/sleep.1700
- The paper
- Calem, M., Bisla, J., Begum, A., Dewey, M., Bebbington, P. E., Brugha, T., Cooper, C., Jenkins, R., Lindesay, J., McManus, S., Meltzer, H., Spiers, N., Weich, S., & Stewart, R. (2012). Increased Prevalence of Insomnia and Changes in Hypnotics Use in England over 15 Years: Analysis of the 1993, 2000, and 2007 National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys. Sleep. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.1700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.