Cited by 38Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Comparative investigation of the psychophysiologic and idiopathic insomnia disorder phenotypes: Psychologic characteristics, patients' perspectives, and implications for clinical management

Open access
Espie, Colin A., Barrie, Laura M., Forgan, Grant S.·2012·Sleep

Abstract

Study Objectives: Insomnia is a common disorder, yet its proposed behavioral phenotypes are seldom differentiated. Two consecutive studies were designed to investigate psychologic characteristics and treatment preferences of people with idiopathic insomnia (IdI) relative to psychophysiologic insomnia (PI). Design: Cross-sectional, two-group comparison studies. Setting: Specialized sleep research center. Participants: 40 participants (29 female, mean age 46 yr) participated in study 1. An additional cohort of 61 adults (48 female, mean age 37 yr) participated in study 2. In total, samples comprised 51 participants with PI and 50 with IdI. All participants met diagnostic criteria for their respective insomnia phenotype. Interventions: N/A Measurements and Results: Study 1 investigated sensitivity to arousal conditioning and sleep effort using self-report measures. Consistent with a model of conditioned arousal, participants with PI exhibited greater behavioral inhibition, i.e., sensitivity to threat and higher levels of sleep preoccupation. Study 2 investigated illness perceptions and cognitions and coping styles using self-report scales, and explored treatment acceptability based on the evaluation of 3 therapeutic scenarios. Results lend support to the hypothesis that IdI is considered somewhat more permanent than PI. Behavioral intervention was preferred to pharmacotherapy by both groups, and an acceptance treatment was considered more favorably by IdI study participants than by those with PI. Conclusions: Many similarities between IdI and PI were observed across psychologic measures, and both groups exhibited a preference for behavioral treatment. However, their distinctive characteristics appear to suggest that an acceptance-based therapy may also be appropriate for some people with IdI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5665/sleep.1702

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

2 of 14 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Background
    § Submitted for publication May, 2011 Submitted in final revised form September, 2011 Accepted for publication September, 2011

    The authors suggest that idiopathic insomnia may be partly defined by the absence of precipitating and maintaining factors and by only minor psychologic abnormalities.

    “IdI is partly defined by the absence of precipitating and maintaining factors, and patients appear to exhibit only minor psychologic abnormalities.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [12] Hauri, 1980, Childhood-onset insomnia, Sleep source

      In Sleep Variables (page unavailable), most childhood-onset patients could not identify a stress at onset, and the authors report a trend toward less fluctuation with mood than in adult-onset patients. The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests a less psychological basis. But the paper studies childhood-onset insomnia, not idiopathic insomnia as a whole; it does not establish an absence of maintaining factors or that patients have only minor psychological abnormalities. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [13] Hauri, 1983, A cluster analysis of insomnia, Sleep source
  • Finding
    § DISCUSSION

    The authors conclude that cognitive behavioral therapy is a rational intervention for both psychophysiologic and idiopathic insomnia patients.

    “there is a rationale for using CBT with both PI and IdI patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [44] Morin, 2006, Psychological and behavioral treatment of insomnia: update of the recent evidence (1998-2004), Sleep source

      Section 4.2 reports CBT treatment involving patients with psychophysiologic insomnia, and Section 5 concludes that CBT is a well-established treatment for insomnia. The copy does not identify patients with idiopathic insomnia or make a recommendation specific to them, so the claim's application to both named groups is not fully supported. The supplied passages and retrieved passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [45] Riemann, 2009, The treatments of chronic insomnia: a review of benzodiazepine receptor agonists and psychological and behavioral therapies, Sleep Med Rev source
    • cites [46] 2005, NIH state-of-the-science conference statement on manifestations and management of chronic insomnia in adults, NIH Consens Sci Statements

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [47] Wilson, 2010, British Association for Psychopharmacology consensus statement on evidence-based treatment of insomnia, parasomnias and circadian rhythm disorders, J Psychopharmacology source
  • Finding
    § Illness perception

    In Study 2, both groups viewed their sleep problems as chronic and were uncertain about treatability and control.

    “mean scores suggest that both groups tended to view their insomnia as variable and outside of their control, and had doubts about its treatability.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding
    § Illness perception

    In Study 2, the idiopathic insomnia group perceived their insomnia as more permanent than the psychophysiologic insomnia group.

    “perceived their insomnia to have greater permanency than did the PI group ( t (59) = 2.18, P = 0.033).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding
    § Coping strategies

    The idiopathic insomnia group reported using humor to cope more often than the psychophysiologic insomnia group.

    “patients with IdI rated using humor to cope significantly more often than those with PI ( t (59) = -2.73,”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(38) = 4.04reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (38) = 4.04, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(2, 37) = 7.98reported p = .001 · recomputed p = .001

    “F(2,37) = 7.98, p = .001”

  • ConsistentF(7, 31) = 3.4reported p = .008 · recomputed p = .008

    “F(7, 31) = 3.40, p = .008”

  • Consistentt(38) = 9.1reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (38) = 9.1, p < .0001”

  • Consistentt(38) = 5.01reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (38) = 5.01, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(59) = 2.18reported p = .033 · recomputed p = .033

    “t (59) = 2.18, p = .033”

  • Consistentt(59) = -2.72reported p = .009 · recomputed p = .009

    “t (59) = -2.72,p = .009”

  • Consistentt(61) = 2.4reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .019

    “t (61) = 2.40, p = .02”

8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Minimum illness-cognition score is misstated

    Minor

    Each subscale has six items scored from 1 to 4, so its minimum score is 6, not 4. The stated maximum of 24 is consistent with six items.

    Reported 4 · recomputed 6

  • Treatment-test degrees of freedom imply a larger sample

    Minor

    Study 2 lists 31 participants with PI and 30 with IdI. Paired tests within those groups would have 30 and 29 degrees of freedom, respectively, rather than the reported 31 and 30; the reported between-group t-test likewise uses 61 rather than the expected 59 degrees of freedom.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Spielman, 1987, Treatment of chronic insomnia by restriction of time in bed, Sleep, 10, 45
  2. Morin, 2006, Psychological and behavioral treatment of insomnia: update of the recent evidence (1998-2004), Sleep, 29, 1398, 10.1093/sleep/29.11.1398 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Riemann, 2009, The treatments of chronic insomnia: a review of benzodiazepine receptor agonists and psychological and behavioral therapies, Sleep Med Rev, 13, 205, 10.1016/j.smrv.2008.06.001 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Espie, C. A., Barrie, L. M., & Forgan, G. S.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Espie, Colin A.
Venue
Sleep
Published
2012-03
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
385-393
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2007322699
Cited by
38
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
insomnia phenotypes, behavioral inhibition, sleep effort, illness perception, coping styles, treatment preferences, acceptance-based therapy, pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Arousal, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Phenotype, Self Concept, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read (extract-v1) on 2026-09-24.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review