Cited by 134Sleep and related disordersMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Usefulness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treating Insomnia in Patients With Anxiety Disorders: A Pilot Study

Yook, Keunyoung, Lee, Sang-Hyuk, Ryu, Mi, Kim, Keun-Hyang, Choi, Tae Kyou, Suh, Shin Young, Kim, Yong-Woo, Kim, Borah +2 more·2008·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the usefulness of a mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for treating insomnia symptoms in patients with anxiety disorder. Nineteen patients with anxiety disorder were assigned to an 8-week MBCT clinical trial. Participants showed significant improvement in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (Z = -3.46, p = 0.00), Penn State Worry Questionnaire (Z = -3.83, p = 0.00), Ruminative Response Scale (Z = -3.83, p = 0.00), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (Z = -3.73, p = 0.00), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores (Z = -3.06, p = 0.00) at the end of the 8-week program as compared with baseline. Multiple regression analysis showed that baseline Penn State Worry Questionnaire scores were associated with baseline Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores. These findings suggest that MBCT can be effective at relieving insomnia symptoms by reducing worry associated sleep disturbances in patients with anxiety disorder. However, well-designed, randomized, controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e31817762ac

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT and mindfulness-based interventions directed at either insomnia or anxiety have moderate effects on the co-occurrence of the other.

    “cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and mindfulness‐based interventions directed at either disorder also have moderate effects on the co‐occurrence of the other (Belleville et al., 2010; Yook et al., 2008)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yook, K., Lee, S.-H., Ryu, M., Kim, K.-H., Choi, T. K., Suh, S. Y., Kim, Y.-W., Kim, B., Kim, M. Y., & Kim, M.-J.
Affiliations
  • CHA University (KR)
  • CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR)
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2008-06
Volume
196
Issue
6
Pages
501-503
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092938705
Cited by
134
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
14.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, insomnia, anxiety disorders, worry, rumination, sleep quality, depression, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Agoraphobia, Anxiety Disorders, Arousal, Attention, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Pilot Projects, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review