Cited by 129Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueEducational Outcomes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sleep Duration and Academic Performance Among Student Pharmacists

Open access
Zeek, Megan L., Savoie, Matthew J., Song, Matthew, Kennemur, Leanna M., Qian, Jingjing, Jungnickel, Paul W., Westrick, Salisa C.·2015·American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Abstract

Objective To identify sleep patterns and frequency of daytime sleepiness and to assess the association between sleep duration and academic performance among student pharmacists.Methods A cross-sectional design was used. An anonymous self-administered paper questionnaire was administered to first-year through third-year students at a pharmacy school.Results Questionnaires were completed by 364 student pharmacists (79.4% response rate and 93.8% cooperation rate). More than half of student pharmacists obtained less than 7 hours of sleep at night during a typical school week (54.7%) and a large majority on the night prior to an examination (81.7%). Almost half (47.8%) felt daytime sleepiness almost every day. Longer sleep duration the night prior to an examination was associated with higher course grades and semester grade point averages (GPAs).Conclusion A majority of student pharmacists had suboptimal durations of sleep, defined as fewer than 7 hours. Adequate sleep the night prior to an examination was positively associated with student course grades and semester GPAs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5688/ajpe79563

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Zeek, M. L., Savoie, M. J., Song, M., Kennemur, L. M., Qian, J., Jungnickel, P. W., & Westrick, S. C.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Westrick, Salisa C.
Venue
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
63
ISSN
0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2400613232
Cited by
129
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
sleep duration, academic performance, pharmacy students, daytime sleepiness, sleep deprivation, exam preparation, grade point average
MeSH terms
Adult, Education, Pharmacy, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Pharmacists, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Students, Pharmacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review