Cited by 96Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessHealth and Well-being Studies

Suicidal ideation and health‐related quality of life in the community

Goldney, Robert D, Fisher, Laura J, Wilson, David H, Cheok, Frida·2001·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the health-related quality of life of people with suicidal ideation in the general community. DESIGN: A Health Omnibus Survey of a random, representative sample of the South Australian population in 1998, conducted by experienced interviewers. SUBJECTS: 3010 people over the age of 15 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: The survey included questions about utilisation of health services and the Short-form Health-related Quality of Life (SF-36) and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instruments. Suicidal ideation was determined in response to a direct question. RESULTS: 79 (2.6%) subjects reported suicidal ideation in the past two weeks. Compared with those without suicidal ideation, subjects with suicidal ideation reported significantly greater use of general practitioners, psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers and outpatient clinics (P<0.001), community health services and other counsellors (P<0.01), and more hospital admissions (P<0.05). Those subjects also scored significantly poorer on all subscales of both instruments (P<0.001), to the extent that they were below the 4th percentile on the role-emotional and mental health dimensions of the SF-36 and the social relationships, psychological wellbeing and overall scores of the AQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Suicidal ideation is associated with poor health-related quality of life. These results in a random and representative community sample add support to the need to improve targeting of those with suicidal ideation on a population basis with a view to earlier intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143717.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of suicidal ideation in this study sample was substantially higher than that of the general population, which ranges from 1.1% to 19.8%.

    “The prevalence in our study sample was substantially higher than that of the general population, ranging from 1.1% to 19.8%.2021”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldney, R. D., Fisher, L. J., Wilson, D. H., & Cheok, F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • The Adelaide ClinicAdelaideSA
  • Centre for Population Studies and EpidemiologyDepartment of Human ServicesAdelaideSA
  • SA Health (AU)
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2001-11
Volume
175
Issue
10
Pages
546-549
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W187786133
Cited by
96
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
suicidal ideation, health-related quality of life, health care utilization, community mental health, hospitalization, SF-36, AQoL, South Australia, early intervention
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Family Practice, Health Services, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, South Australia, Suicide, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review