Cited by 11Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Polycystic ovary syndrome and abnormal glucose tolerance

Teede, Helena J, Stuckey, Bronwyn G A·2007·Medical Journal of Australia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01271.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teede, H. J., & Stuckey, B. G. A.
Affiliations
  • Jean Hailes (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Teede, Helena J
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2007-09
Volume
187
Issue
6
Pages
324-325
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2460372126
Cited by
11
References
13
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Female, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review