Cited by 103Cardiac Health and Mental HealthWorkplace Health and Well-beingCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Psychosocial risk factors for coronary heart disease

Glozier, Nick, Tofler, Geoffrey H, Colquhoun, David M, Bunker, Stephen J, Clarke, David M, Hare, David L, Hickie, Ian B, Tatoulis, James +3 more·2013·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

In 2003, the National Heart Foundation of Australia published a position statement on psychosocial risk factors and coronary heart disease (CHD). This consensus statement provides an updated review of the literature on psychosocial stressors, including chronic stressors (in particular, work stress), acute individual stressors and acute population stressors, to guide health professionals based on current evidence. It complements a separate updated statement on depression and CHD. Perceived chronic job strain and shift work are associated with a small absolute increased risk of developing CHD, but there is limited evidence regarding their effect on the prognosis of CHD. Evidence regarding a relationship between CHD and job (in)security, job satisfaction, working hours, effort-reward imbalance and job loss is inconclusive. Expert consensus is that workplace programs aimed at weight loss, exercise and other standard cardiovascular risk factors may have positive outcomes for these risk factors, but no evidence is available regarding the effect of such programs on the development of CHD. Social isolation after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with an adverse prognosis. Expert consensus is that although measures to reduce social isolation are likely to produce positive psychosocial effects, it is unclear whether this would also improve CHD outcomes. Acute emotional stress may trigger MI or takotsubo ("stress") cardiomyopathy, but the absolute increase in transient risk from an individual stressor is low. Psychosocial stressors have an impact on CHD, but clinical significance and prevention require further study. Awareness of the potential for increased cardiovascular risk among populations exposed to natural disasters and other conditions of extreme stress may be useful for emergency services response planning. Wider public access to defibrillators should be available where large populations gather, such as sporting venues and airports, and as part of the response to natural and other disasters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/mja13.10440

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glozier, N., Tofler, G. H., Colquhoun, D. M., Bunker, S. J., Clarke, D. M., Hare, D. L., Hickie, I. B., Tatoulis, J., Thompson, D. R., Wilson, A., & Branagan, M. G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Branagan, Maree G
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2013-08
Volume
199
Issue
3
Pages
179-180
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W1981950242
Cited by
103
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 2
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
coronary artery disease, psychosocial risk factors, psychosocial stress, occupational stress, job strain, shift work, job insecurity, job satisfaction, working hours, effort-reward imbalance, job loss, workplace health programs, social isolation, myocardial infarction, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, acute emotional stress, natural disasters, public access defibrillators, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Coronary Disease, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupations, Psychology, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Societies, Medical, Stress, Psychological, Work Schedule Tolerance, Incidence, Workplace, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Evidence-Based Medicine, Consensus, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review