Cited by 129Agriculture and Farm SafetyMental Health Treatment and AccessCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Drought‐related stress among farmers: findings from the Australian Rural Mental Health Study

Austin, Emma K, Handley, Tonelle, Kiem, Anthony S, Rich, Jane L, Lewin, Terry J, Askland, Hedda H, Askarimarnani, Sara S, Perkins, David A +1 more·2018·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate general and drought-related stress experienced by farmers at both the personal and community levels, and whether socio-demographic and community factors influence this stress. DESIGN: Multivariate analysis of data from the Australian Rural Mental Health Study (ARMHS), a longitudinal cohort study (2007-2013). SETTING: Non-metropolitan New South Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Subset of 664 ARMHS participants (at baseline) who identified as living or working on a farm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Personal drought-related stress (PDS), community drought-related stress (CDS), and general psychological distress (K10 score). RESULTS: Farmers who were under 35, both lived and worked on a farm, experienced greater financial hardship, and were in outer regional, remote or very remote NSW reported PDS particularly frequently. Of these factors, only being under 35 and increased remoteness were associated with higher incidence of CDS. Mild wet weather during the prior 12 months reduced PDS and CDS but increased general distress. Moderate or extreme wet weather did not affect PDS or general distress, but moderate wet weather was associated with increased CDS. Drought-related stress and general psychological distress were influenced by different socio-demographic and community factors. CONCLUSIONS: Farmers in NSW experience significant stress about the effects of drought on themselves, their families, and their communities. Farmers who are younger, live and work on a farm, experience financial hardship, or are isolated are at particular risk of drought-related stress. Medical practitioners who provide assistance to farmers and farming communities can contribute to initiatives that relieve stress about drought.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/mja17.01200

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A longitudinal cohort study showed elevated drought-related stress and psychological distress (as measured by the K10) among farmers.

    “A longitudinal cohort study showed elevated drought-related stress and psychological distress (as measured by the K10) among farmers [32].”

    From Climate Change and Mental Health: A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [32]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Austin, E. K., Handley, T., Kiem, A. S., Rich, J. L., Lewin, T. J., Askland, H. H., Askarimarnani, S. S., Perkins, D. A., & Kelly, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health (AU)
  • Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
  • Centre for Water, Climate and Land, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
Corresponding author
Austin, Emma K
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-30
Volume
209
Issue
4
Pages
159-165
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2884782486
Cited by
129
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (401241, 631061)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
farmers, psychological distress, community stress, rural mental health, financial hardship, remoteness, young farmers, rainy weather, sociodemographic factors
MeSH terms
Farmers, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Rural Population, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult, Droughts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review