Cited by 72Mental Health Treatment and AccessClimate Change and Health ImpactsAgriculture and Farm Safety

Drought and Distress in Southeastern Australia

Hanigan, Ivan C., Schirmer, Jacki, Niyonsenga, Theophile·2018·EcoHealth

Abstract

Droughts may increase the risk of mental health problems, but evidence suggests a complex story with some groups being vulnerable while others are not. Previous studies from Australia have found associations with suicide, depression and distress that vary by age, gender and remoteness. Understanding the effects of drought on mental health is important because drought is predicted to be more intense in some areas in the future. We investigated the associations between drought and distress in a survey of rural Australians by age, gender and farming status. We collected distress data using a survey of 5312 people from across the state of Victoria, Australia, in 2015. Respondents completed the Kessler 10 (K10) Psychological Distress Index, and demographic and general health data were collected. We linked a climatic drought index to the locality of residence of respondents. Associations between distress and drought were analyzed using multivariable regression models with interactions by age, gender and farming occupation. Parts of Victoria were in drought in 2015. Drought duration was associated with higher distress in younger rural women (aged 40-54: odds ratio 1.18 per inter-quartile range increase in drought duration) but not older rural women or men. This pattern did not vary between farmers and non-farmers. Drought was associated with increased distress, but this differed between subgroups. Our results suggest that supporting younger women may be particularly important, and understanding ways older Australian rural women cope may enable us to build adaptive capacity and resilience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10393-018-1339-0

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence for differential impacts of drought on gender and age is conflicting.

    “The evidence for differential impacts on gender and age is conflicting [35,36,37].”

    From Climate Change and Mental Health: A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanigan, I. C., Schirmer, J., & Niyonsenga, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
Corresponding author
Hanigan, Ivan C.
Venue
EcoHealth
Published
2018-05-24
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
642-655
ISSN
  • 1612-9202 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-9210
OpenAlex
W2804210929
Cited by
72
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • EcoHealth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Clarence City Council
  • Australian National University
  • Bega Valley Shire Council
  • NSW Office of Environment and Heritage
  • Murray Local Land Services
  • Murray-Darling Basin Authority
  • Victorian Department of Economic Development, Land, Transport and Resources
  • Department of Agriculture and Water Resources
  • University of Canberra
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
Keywords
drought, psychological distress, mental health, rural women, young women, age differences, gender differences, drought duration, Victoria, Australia, rural health, resilience
MeSH terms
Farmers, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Victoria, Young Adult, Droughts, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review