The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Hidden Cost of Tourism: Detecting Long-term Effects of Tourism Using Behavioral Information
Open accessAbstract
Increasingly, whales and dolphins are the focus of tourism activities in many coastal locations. Although these activities can affect individuals and populations of cetaceans, the biological significance and hence the cost of these impacts are as yet largely unknown. This study assessed the effects of boat interactions on the behavioral budget of two populations of bottlenose dolphins (Tersiops truncatus) living in similar fjords but exposed to different levels of tourism activities. This comparison makes it possible to assess the costs of short-term avoidance strategies and the threshold at which those strategies are no longer effective. The effects of boat interactions were the same in both fjords. The resting state was the most sensitive to interactions; socializing was less sensitive. Short-term displacement was a typical response to boat exposure: dolphins were more likely to travel after an interaction with a vessel. Although the behavioral budgets of these populations were significantly altered during interactions with boats, their overall behavioral budgets were unchanged. Dolphins in Milford Sound actively avoided boat interactions, possibly to maintain their overall behavioral budget unchanged. This active avoidance led to avoidance of the area. Characteristics of dolphin-boat interactions in Milford Sound suggest that the advantages gained by short-term avoidance are lost if, on average, fewer than 68 min elapse between successive interactions with boats. If dolphin-boat interactions were more frequent than this, the dolphins switched to a longer-term response: area avoidance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare.
Moberg, G. P. (2000) · The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. · doi:10.1079/9780851993591.0001 · Cited by 768
Optimal strategies for predator avoidance: The relative importance of speed and manoeuvrability
Howland, H. C. (1974) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90202-1 · Cited by 412
Cited by
Decline in Relative Abundance of Bottlenose Dolphins Exposed to Long‐Term Disturbance
BEJDER, L., SAMUELS, A., WHITEHEAD, H., GALES, N., MANN, J., CONNOR, R., HEITHAUS, M., WATSON‐CAPPS, J., FLAHERTY, C., & KRÜTZEN, M. (2006) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00540.x · Cited by 658
Estimating relative energetic costs of human disturbance to killer whales (Orcinus orca)
Williams, R., Lusseau, D., & Hammond, P. S. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.010 · Cited by 371
Self-citationNo persistent behavioural effects of SCUBA diving on reef sharks
Bradley, D., Papastamatiou, Y., & Caselle, J. (2017) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps12053 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Lusseau, D.
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159335390
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Hidden Cost of Tourism: Detecting Long-term Effects of Tourism Using Behavioral Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5751/es-00614-090102
- The paper
- Lusseau, D. (2004). The Hidden Cost of Tourism: Detecting Long-term Effects of Tourism Using Behavioral Information. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-00614-090102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.