The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Review of Tools for Incorporating Community Knowledge, Preferences, and Values into Decision Making in Natural Resources Management
Open accessAbstract
Lynam, T., W. De Jong, D. Sheil, T. Kusumanto, and K. Evans. 2007. A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society 12(1): 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01987-120105
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001 · Cited by 2,254
A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities
Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5 · Cited by 1,398
Voinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007 · Cited by 1,354
Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job
Voinov, A., Jenni, K., Gray, S., Kolagani, N., Glynn, P. D., Bommel, P., Prell, C., Zellner, M., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., et al. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028 · Cited by 428
Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future
BERKES, F. (2010) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s037689291000072x · Cited by 377
The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management
Pahl-Wostl, C., Tàbara, D., Bouwen, R., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Ridder, D., & Taillieu, T. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.007 · Cited by 346
Hill, R., Grant, C., George, M., Robinson, C. J., Jackson, S., & Abel, N. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-04587-170123 · Cited by 262
Jakku, E., & Thorburn, P. J. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.08.007 · Cited by 204
How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods
Berthet, E. T. A., Barnaud, C., Girard, N., Labatut, J., & Martin, G. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627 · Cited by 159
Astier, M., García-Barrios, L., Galván-Miyoshi, Y., González-Esquivel, C. E., & Masera, O. R. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-04910-170325 · Cited by 137
Gray, S., Voinov, A., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., BenDor, T., Bommel, P., Glynn, P., Hedelin, B., Hubacek, K., Introne, J., et al. (2018) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1627 · Cited by 106
Gonzalez, A., Mouquet, N., & Loreau, M. (2009) · Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0010 · Cited by 92
Managing the wicked problem of transdisciplinary team formation in socio-ecological systems
Norris, P. E., O'Rourke, M., Mayer, A. S., & Halvorsen, K. E. (2016) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.008 · Cited by 91
Carmona, G., Varela-Ortega, C., & Bromley, J. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.019 · Cited by 72
Domínguez-Ares, E., Martín-Olmedo, P., & Iglesias-Merchan, C. (2020) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106445 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynam, T., de Jong, W., Sheil, D., Kusumanto, T., & Evans, K.
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W61562365
- Cited by
- 738
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
