The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Learning and Water Resources Management
Open accessAbstract
Natural resources management in general, and water resources management in particular, are currently undergoing a major paradigm shift.Management practices have largely been developed and implemented by experts using technical means based on designing systems that can be predicted and controlled.In recent years, stakeholder involvement has gained increasing importance.Collaborative governance is considered to be more appropriate for integrated and adaptive management regimes needed to cope with the complexity of social-ecological systems.The paper presents a concept for social learning and collaborative governance developed in the European project HarmoniCOP (Harmonizing COllaborative Planning).The concept is rooted in the more interpretive strands of the social sciences emphasizing the context dependence of knowledge.The role of frames and boundary management in processes of learning at different levels and time scales is investigated.The foundation of social learning as investigated in the HarmoniCOP project is multiparty collaboration processes that are perceived to be the nuclei of learning processes.Such processes take place in networks or "communities of practice" and are influenced by the governance structure in which they are embedded.Requirements for social learning include institutional settings that guarantee some degree of stability and certainty without being rigid and inflexible.Our analyses, which are based on conceptual considerations and empirical insights, suggest that the development of such institutional settings involves continued processes of social learning.In these processes, stakeholders at different scales are connected in flexible networks that allow them to develop the capacity and trust they need to collaborate in a wide range of formal and informal relationships ranging from formal legal structures and contracts to informal, voluntary agreements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems
Wenger, E. (2000) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840072002 · Cited by 4,274 · cited 1×
“Wenger originally developed his concepts for business environments, but, in recent years, these concepts have been used to analyze interorganizational collaborations and emerging social entities in general (Wenger 2000).”
Background
Cited by
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001 · Cited by 2,254
Self-citationA review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities
Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5 · Cited by 1,398
Folke, C. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09088-210444 · Cited by 982
Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mux030 · Cited by 604
Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future
BERKES, F. (2010) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s037689291000072x · Cited by 377
The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management
Pahl-Wostl, C., Tàbara, D., Bouwen, R., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Ridder, D., & Taillieu, T. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.007 · Cited by 346
Self-citationJakku, E., & Thorburn, P. J. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.08.007 · Cited by 204
Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework
Barnaud, C., Corbera, E., Muradian, R., Salliou, N., Sirami, C., Vialatte, A., Choisis, J.-P., Dendoncker, N., Mathevet, R., Moreau, C., et al. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09848-230115 · Cited by 180
How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods
Berthet, E. T. A., Barnaud, C., Girard, N., Labatut, J., & Martin, G. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627 · Cited by 159
Adapting the theory of resilience to energy systems: a review and outlook
Jesse, B.-J., Heinrichs, H. U., & Kuckshinrichs, W. (2019) · Energy, Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-019-0210-7 · Cited by 116
Della Rossa, P., Mottes, C., Cattan, P., & Le Bail, M. (2022) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103337 · Cited by 24
The German Permaculture Community from a Community of Practice Perspective
Ulbrich, R., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11051241 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., & Taillieu, T.
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1572817382
- Cited by
- 1,314
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.