Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,257

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hepatogastroenterology

·2011·Hepatogastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In this study, we explored the role of the Hedgehog signaling pathway in liver regeneration. METHODOLOGY: Retrorsine, partial hepatectomy and combined were utilized in mature Fisher344 rats. Specific assays, such as RT-PCR, real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry were used to detect the constituents of the Hedgehog signaling pathway during liver regeneration. RESULTS: mRNA expression of Ihh, Ptc, Smo, Gli1, Gli2 and Gli3 were all shown in liver tissue homogenates in control/normal, retrorsine, partial hepatectomy and retrorsine/partial hepatectomy groups while no Shh expression was found. Real-time PCR analysis indicated that there were significant differences in Hedgehog signaling pathway-related constituents (Ihh, Ptc, Gli1 and Gli3) among the different treatment groups and at distinct time points in the same treatment group during liver regeneration. The data also suggested an interaction effect between different treatment and time to the variation of Ihh, Ptc, Gli1 and Gli3. The protein expression of Ptc and Gli1 in liver regeneration was confirmed by immunohistochemistry, which differed in the duration among different groups. Nevertheless, the protein expression of Ptc and Gli1 were not detected successfully by western blot. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that the Hedgehog signaling pathway may be involved in liver regeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5754/hge11155

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Hepatogastroenterology
Published
2011-10-18
Volume
58
Issue
112
Pages
2071-6
ISSN
0172-6390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2402529736
Cited by
1,257
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.