The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of text, audio, video, and in-person communication on bonding between friends
Open accessAbstract
Considerable research on computer-mediated communication has examined online communication between strangers, but little is known about the emotional experience of connectedness between friends in digital environments. However, adolescents and emerging adults use digital communication primarily to communicate with existing friends rather than to make new connections. We compared feelings of emotional connectedness as they occurred in person and through digital communication among pairs of close friends in emerging adulthood. Fifty-eight young women, recruited in pairs of close friends, engaged in four conversations each: in-person, video chat, audio chat, and instant messaging (IM). Bonding in each condition was measured through both self-report and affiliation cues (i.e., nonverbal behaviors associated with the emotional experience of bonding). Participants reported feeling connected in all conditions. However, bonding, as measured by both self-report and affiliation cues, differed significantly across conditions, with the greatest bonding during in-person interaction, followed by video chat, audio chat, and IM in that order. Compared with other participants, those who used video chat more frequently reported greater bonding with friends through video chat in our study. Compared with other participants, those who spoke on the phone more frequently with their participating friend reported greater bonding during audio chat. Use of textual affiliation cues like emoticons, typed laughter, and excessive letter capitalization during IM related to increased bonding experience during IM. Nonetheless, a significantly lower level of bonding was experienced in IM compared with in-person communication. Because adolescent and emerging adults’ digital communication is primarily text-based, this finding has significant real-world implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“perhaps indicating that emotional support received in these environments may be less impactful.”
From Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context: Part 1—A Theoretical Framework and Application to Dyadic Peer Relationships (2018) · cites this paper as Sherman et al. 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424816 · Cited by 11,104
SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference
Mallery, P., & George, D. (1998) · Cited by 10,312
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other
Fernández Pedemonte, D. (2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-7239 · Cited by 4,608
The online disinhibition effect
Suler, J. (2004) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/1094931041291295 · Cited by 4,375
Cognitive and affective development in adolescence
Steinberg, L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005 · Cited by 2,978
Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction
Walther, J. B. (1992) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365092019001003 · Cited by 2,664
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–214 of 214
Healing the Scars of Partition
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191923944.003.0006
The Micro-Sociology of Social Bonds in Diplomacy
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191923944.003.0004
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191923944.002.0007
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191923944.002.0005
Demystifying Personal Chemistry in Diplomacy
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191923944.003.0003
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191923944.002.0006
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191923944.003.0008
Note on Previously Published Material
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191923944.002.0004
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191923944.003.0001
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191923944.003.0007
Golbin, R. A. (2026) · International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development · doi:10.4018/ijskd.417992
Langlais, M. R., Seidman, G., & Matsuo, H. (2026) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2026.102451
Perbandingan Akses Mahasiswa terhadap Media Pembelajaran Daring dalam Penerapan Flipped Classroom
Sengkey, D. F., Paturusi, S. D. E., & Sambul, A. M. (2020) · E-JOURNAL TEKNIK ELEKTRO DAN KOMPUTER · doi:10.35793/jtek.v9i1.28634
Dawel, A., Monaghan, C., Shou, Y., Mewton, P., Farrer, L. M., Gulliver, A., Newman, E. J., McCallum, S. M., & Cherbuin, N. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2735496
Metadata
- Authors
- Sherman, L. E., Michikyan, M., & Greenfield, P. M.
- Venue
- Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace
- Publisher
- Masaryk University Press
- Published
- 2013-07-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1802-7962 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2320528903
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- emotional connection, computer-mediated communication, video chat, instant messaging, face-to-face communication, nonverbal behavior, emoticons, emerging adulthood, adolescents, close friends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review