Cited by 37Digital Mental Health InterventionsDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Intellectual disability and computers in therapy: Views of service users and clinical psychologists

Open access
Vereenooghe, Leen, Gega, Lina, Langdon, Peter E.·2017·Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace

Abstract

Digital media have increased the accessibility of psychological therapies for the general population, but not for people with intellectual disability (ID), despite their greater mental health needs. This study explores and compares the views of service users and clinicians on how computers can be integrated in psychological therapies for people with ID who are traditionally under-represented in mainstream services. We conducted in-depth unstructured interviews with three clinicians who had experience of working with people with ID and with three adults with ID who have experienced computerised training in cognitive behaviour therapy skills. The interviews explored the a) potential functions and benefits, b) anticipated challenges and barriers, and c) required design features of computers in therapy for people with ID. We used inductive coding to identify independent themes in the responses of clinicians and service users, and then compared the emerging themes between the two sets of participants to arrive at common themes. Six common themes emerged from service user and clinician responses: confidentiality of personal information and online applications, barriers in the communication with the therapist, value of therapist and personal contact, access to computer technologies, engagement potential of computer programmes and home practice. Three further themes were specific to clinician responses: patient suitability for computerised approaches, clinician distrust of computerised interventions, and involving a third party. Computer technologies open up possibilities for psychological therapy with people with ID by helping them overcome in-session communication difficulties and practise skills at home. On-screen pictures, interactive games, symbols, sign language and touch-screen are key design features to help engagement. The main challenges are clinician-reported difficulties in their own capacity and capability to access and use computers and in fitting computers into their own defined roles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5817/cp2017-1-11

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wehmeyer, M. L., Smith, S. J., Palmer, S. B., & Davies, D. K. (2004). The effect of student-directed transition planning with a computer- based reading support program on the self-determination of students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19, 7 -22.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vereenooghe, L., Gega, L., & Langdon, P. E.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Vereenooghe, Leen
Venue
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace
Published
2017-05-31
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
1802-7962 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2589129339
Cited by
37
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (PDF-2011-04-040)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
intellectual disability, cognitive behavioral therapy, service user perspectives, clinician perspectives, digital mental health, patient-therapist communication, confidentiality, home practice, underrepresented groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review