Cited by 33Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Patients’ experiences of internet-based Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a qualitative study

Open access
Bendelin, Nina, Björkdahl, Pär, Risell, Mimmi, Nelson, Karin Zetterqvist, Gerdle, Björn, Andersson, Gerhard, Buhrman, Monica·2020·BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain is a globally widespread condition with complex clusters of symptoms within a heterogeneous patient group. Internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (IACT) has shown promising results in the treatment of chronic pain. How IACT is experienced by patients is less well known. Qualitative studies of patients’ experiences are needed to further understand factors behind both engagement and negative effects. The aim of this study was to explore how IACT was experienced by chronic pain patients who had participated in a controlled trial. Methods: Through an open and exploratory approach this study aimed to investigate how IACT was experienced when delivered as a guided self-help program to persons with chronic pain. Eleven participants were interviewed over telephone after completing IACT. Results: Qualitative analysis based on grounded theory resulted in 2 core categories and 8 subcategories. In treatment: Physical and cognitive restraints, Time and deadline, Therapist contact, and Self-confrontation. After treatment: Attitude to pain, Image of pain, Control or Command, and Acting with pain. Individual differences as well as specific conditions of the treatment may explain variations in how the treatment was approached, experienced and what consequences it led to. Therapist guidance and deadlines for homework play complex roles in relation to autonomy and change. Conclusions: Adjusting treatment content and format based on participants’ characteristics, such as expectations, motivation and restraints, might positively affect engagement, autonomy and change. Further research on attrition and negative effects of treatment might clarify what enables chronic pain patients to benefit from IACT. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01603797). Registered 22 May 2012. Retrospectively registered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12891-020-03198-1

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACT promoting acceptance, mindfulness, and committed action to living in alignment with values may improve QoL and decrease psychological distress by helping those who receive the therapy better manage uncomfortable or negative emotions, thoughts, and experiences; accept them without judgment; and move forward to valued living.

    “ACT promoting acceptance, mindfulness, and committed action to living in alignment with values may improve QoL and decrease psychological distress by helping those who receive the therapy better manage uncomfortable or negative emotions, thoughts, and experiences; accept them without judgment; and move forward to valued living [54,55].”

    From Efficacy of Internet-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety, Stress, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (2022) · cites this paper as [54]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bendelin, N., Björkdahl, P., Risell, M., Nelson, K. Z., Gerdle, B., Andersson, G., & Buhrman, M.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Bendelin, Nina
Venue
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2020-04-06
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
212-212
ISSN
1471-2474 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014193525
Cited by
33
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
County Council of Östergötland (SC-2019-00155-39)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic pain, patient experience, guided self-help, treatment engagement, autonomy, therapist contact, pain attitudes, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Telephone, Treatment Outcome, Qualitative Research, Chronic Pain, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review