CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 249Quality and Management SystemsManagement and Organizational StudiesEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Institutional Perspective on the Diffusion of International Management System Standards: The Case of the Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001

Open access
Delmas, Magali A., Montes-Sancho, Maria J.·2011·Business Ethics Quarterly
DOI 10.5840/beq20112115
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper analyzes how national institutional factors affect the adoption of the international environmental management standard ISO 14001, using a panel of 139 countries from 1996 to 2006. The analysis emphasizes that during the emerging phase of the standard, the potential lack of consensus within the constituents of the national institutional environment concerning the value of a new standard could send mixed signals to firms about the standard. The results show that in the early phase of adoption, regulative and normative forces within the institutional environment can work against each other. Results also show that regulative or coercive forces play a relatively more important role in the early phase of adoption of the standard than in the subsequent phases of diffusion. In the later phases of diffusion of ISO 14001, normative forces, such as the diffusion of other management standards, as well as factors related to trade, play a more important role. Because of the similarities between environmental management standards and corporate social responsibility standards, this study can help identify some of the challenges for diffusion of ISO management standards in the area of social responsibility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5840/beq20112115

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Zucker, 1983, Perspectives in organizational sociology: Theory and research, 2
  2. Feenstra, 2000, World trade flows, 1980–1997
  3. Rodgers, 1996, The ISO environmental standards initiative, New York University Environmental Law Journal, 5, 181
  4. Mendel, 2001, Global models of organization: international management standards, reforms, and movements
  5. Darnall, 2003, Best paper proceedings: Sixty-first meeting of the Academy of Management
  6. Hoffman, 2002, Organizations, policy and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives
  7. Arias, 1998, The diffusion and consumption of business knowledge
  8. Coglianese, 2001, Regulating from the inside: Can environmental management systems achieve policy goals?
  9. Scott, 1995, Institutions and Organizations
  10. Andrews, 2003, Environmental management systems: Do they improve performance? Final report of the National Database on Environmental Management Systems Pilot Project
  11. Tolbert, 1996, Handbook of organization studies, 175
  12. Delmas, 2000, Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 1
  13. DiMaggio, 1988, Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment, 3
  14. Rogers, 1962, Diffusion of innovations
  15. Greene, 2003, Econometric analysis
  16. March, 1958, Organizations
  17. 2005, The ISO survey of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 certificates
  18. 2006, The ISO survey of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 certificates
  19. Mahajan, 2000, New-Product Diffusion Models
  20. Orts E. W. , & Murray P. C. 1997. Environmental disclosure and evidentiary privilege. University of Illinois Law Review: 1–69.
  21. 10.5465/amr.1994.9412271805 · DOI
  22. Uzumeri, 1997, ISO 9000 and other metastandards: Principles for management practice, Academy of Management Executive, 11, 21
  23. Watkins, 1999, Buying into ISO 14001, Occupational Health and Safety, 68, 52

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Delmas, M. A., & Montes-Sancho, M. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
ORCID
Delmas, Magali A.
Venue
Business Ethics Quarterly
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2011-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
103-132
ISSN
  • 1052-150X (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-3326
DOI
10.5840/beq20112115
OpenAlex
W2150649775
Cited by
249
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
51.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 1483 d)
Locations
  • Business Ethics Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Quality and Management Systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
ISO 14001, environmental management standards, institutional theory, normative force, coercivity, international standards adoption, corporate social responsibility standards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review