CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 147Ethics in Business and EducationPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryValues and Moral Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Virtue Ethics as a Resource in Business

Open access
Audi, Robert·2012·Business Ethics Quarterly
DOI 10.5840/beq201222220
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This article provides an account of virtues as praiseworthy traits of character with a far-reaching capacity to influence conduct. Virtues supply their possessors both with good reasons that indicate, for diverse contexts, what sort of thing should be done and with motivation to do them. This motivational power of virtue is crucial for the question of what kind of person, or businessperson, one wants to be. The article shows how the contrast between virtue ethics and rule ethics is often drawn too sharply and indicates how virtue theories can incorporate both theoretical and practical uses of rules. More generally, it shows how a virtue orientation affects attitudes in management practices and how an understanding of certain virtues can help in making better decisions, both ethically and in relation to success in business.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5840/beq201222220

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ross, 1930, The Right and the Good
  2. 10.1017/CBO9781139878364 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Audi, 2006, The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory
  4. MacIntyre, 1984, After Virtue

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 147

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Audi, R.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Audi, Robert
ORCID
Audi, Robert
Venue
Business Ethics Quarterly
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2012-04
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
273-291
ISSN
  • 1052-150X (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-3326
DOI
10.5840/beq201222220
OpenAlex
W1970244549
Cited by
146
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
26.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 1027 d)
Locations
  • Business Ethics Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Education › Values and Moral Education
Keywords
virtue ethics, business ethics, character virtues, motivation, practical reason, management decision-making, management practices, business success

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review