Cited by 26Education Discipline and InequalityBehavioral and Psychological StudiesEducational Assessment and Improvement

Eliminating the Racial Disparity in Classroom Exclusionary Discipline

Open access
Gregory, Anne, Allen, Joseph P., Mikami, Amori Yee, Hafen, Christopher A, Pianta, Robert·2015·Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk

Abstract

Advocates call for schools with high suspension rates to receive technical assistance in adopting “proven-effective” systematic supports. Such supports include teacher professional development. This call is justified given evidence that good teaching matters. But what types of professional development should be funded? Increasingly, research points to the promise of programs that are sustained, rigorous, and focused on teachers’ interactions with students. The current study tests whether a professional development program with these three characteristics helped change teachers’ use of exclusionary discipline practices—especially with their African American students. Exclusionary discipline is when a classroom teacher sends a student to the administrators’ office for perceived misbehavior. Administrators then typically assign a consequence, usually in the form of suspension (in-school or out-of school). The My Teaching Partner-Secondary (MTP-S) aims to improve teachers’ interactions with their students when implementing instruction and managing behavior. MTP-S helps teachers offer clear routines, implement consistent rules, and monitor behavior in a proactive way. The program also supports teachers in developing warm, respectful relationships that recognize students’ needs for autonomy and leadership. Teachers are paired with a coach for an entire school year (sustained approach), they regularly reflect on videorecordings of their classroom instruction and carefully observe how they interact with students, and they apply the validated Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS-S) to improve the quality of their interactions (rigorous approach). In the current study, a randomized controlled trial found that teachers receiving MTP-S relied less on exclusionary discipline compared to the control teachers. Specifically, MTP-S teachers issued fewer exclusionary discipline referrals to their African American students. This is the first study to show that programs like MTP-S that focus on teacher-student interactions in a sustained manner using a rigorous approach can actually reduce the disproportionate use of exclusionary discipline with African American students. More broadly, the findings offer policymakers direction in identifying types of professional development programs that have promise for reducing the racial discipline gap.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.58464/2155-5834.1212

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, Vol. 5 [2014], Iss. 2, Art. 12 https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol5/iss2/12 DOI: 10.58464/2155-5834.1212 Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, Vol. 5 [2014], Iss. 2, Art. 12 https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol5/iss2/12 DOI: 10.58464/2155-5834.1212 References

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gregory, A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Hafen, C. A., & Pianta, R.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk
Published
2015-02-03
Volume
5
Issue
2
ISSN
2155-5834 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2993764914
Cited by
26
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Research on Children Informing Policy for Children at Risk (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Institute of Education Sciences (R305A100367)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
exclusionary discipline, racial disparities in discipline, school suspension, teacher professional development, teacher-student relationship, African American students, Classroom Assessment Scoring System, classroom behavior management, coaching, school discipline policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review