The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
Open accessAbstract
Research into rehabilitation robotics has grown rapidly and the number of therapeutic rehabilitation robots has expanded dramatically during the last two decades. Robotic rehabilitation therapy can deliver high-dosage and high-intensity training, making it useful for patients with motor disorders caused by stroke or spinal cord disease. Robotic devices used for motor rehabilitation include end-effector and exoskeleton types; herein, we review the clinical use of both types. One application of robot-assisted therapy is improvement of gait function in patients with stroke. Both end-effector and the exoskeleton devices have proven to be effective complements to conventional physiotherapy in patients with subacute stroke, but there is no clear evidence that robotic gait training is superior to conventional physiotherapy in patients with chronic stroke or when delivered alone. In another application, upper limb motor function training in patients recovering from stroke, robot-assisted therapy was comparable or superior to conventional therapy in patients with subacute stroke. With end-effector devices, the intensity of therapy was the most important determinant of upper limb motor recovery. However, there is insufficient evidence for the use of exoskeleton devices for upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. For rehabilitation of hand motor function, either end-effector and exoskeleton devices showed similar or additive effects relative to conventional therapy in patients with chronic stroke. The present evidence supports the use of robot-assisted therapy for improving motor function in stroke patients as an additional therapeutic intervention in combination with the conventional rehabilitation therapies. Nevertheless, there will be substantial opportunities for technical development in near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Langhorne, P., Bernhardt, J., & Kwakkel, G. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60325-5 · Cited by 2,726
Guidelines for Management of Ischaemic Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack 2008
(2008) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000131083 · Cited by 2,489
Robot-Assisted Therapy for Long-Term Upper-Limb Impairment after Stroke
Lo, A. C., Guarino, P. D., Richards, L. G., Haselkorn, J. K., Wittenberg, G. F., Federman, D. G., Ringer, R. J., Wagner, T. H., Krebs, H. I., Volpe, B. T., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0911341 · Cited by 1,397
Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., Shor, P. C., Majmundar, M., & Van der Loos, M. (2002) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.33101 · Cited by 1,159 · cited 2×
“End-effector-type robotic devices Fourteen randomized controlled trials comparing robot-assisted therapy that use end-effector-type devices with conventional therapies for improvement of upper limb motor function after stroke were selected for review (Table 2).(29-41) The metaanalysis in a 2012 Cochrane review demonst…”
MethodResultIntensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial
Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R. C., Twisk, J. W., Lankhorst, G. J., & Koetsier, J. C. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)09477-x · Cited by 938
Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Platz, T., Kugler, J., & Elsner, B. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006876.pub4 · Cited by 678
Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke
Hidler, J., Nichols, D., Pelliccio, M., Brady, K., Campbell, D. D., Kahn, J. H., & Hornby, T. G. (2009) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968308326632 · Cited by 652
Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke
Takahashi, C. D., Der-Yeghiaian, L., Le, V., Motiwala, R. R., & Cramer, S. C. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm311 · Cited by 624
Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke
Mehrholz, J., Thomas, S., Werner, C., Kugler, J., Pohl, M., & Elsner, B. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006185.pub4 · Cited by 564
Hornby, T. G., Campbell, D. D., Kahn, J. H., Demott, T., Moore, J. L., & Roth, H. R. (2008) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.504779 · Cited by 541
Cited by
Hatem, S. M., Saussez, G., della Faille, M., Prist, V., Zhang, X., Dispa, D., & Bleyenheuft, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442 · Cited by 918
Home-based technologies for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review
Chen, Y., Abel, K. T., Janecek, J. T., Chen, Y., Zheng, K., & Cramer, S. C. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.12.001 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, W. H., & Kim, Y.-H.
- Venue
- Journal of Stroke
- Publisher
- Korean Stroke Society
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 174
- ISSN
- 2287-6391 (ISSN-L)
- 2287-6405
- OpenAlex
- W2121658418
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 19.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5853/jos.2013.15.3.174
- The paper
- Chang, W. H., & Kim, Y.-H. (2013). Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation. Journal of Stroke. https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2013.15.3.174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.