Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The heritage of experimental embryology: Hans Spemann and the organizer

·1988·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

The subject of experimental em- bryology is often thought to have reached its climax in the 1920s, with Spemann's organizer graft experiment of 1924 (for which he subsequently received the Nobel Prize) being seen as the crowning achievement of this period. By the middle of the century, the re- sources of experimental embry- ology seemed to many to have been exhausted. 'If', as Dr Ham- burger says 'experimental embry- ology has become a chapter in the history of biology', perhaps the time has come to record its history and take its measure. This fascinating book by Viktor Ham- burger describes experimental embryology in the Spemann lab during the 1920s and 1930s. There can be no-one better quali- fied to give a personal account of that area, and Dr Hamburger has done a superb job, paying great attention to detail and yet making the book extremely readable and enjoyable. Dr Hamburger worked in the same institute as Spemann in the 1920s, and can therefore report from personal experience what life was like in that laboratory at the time of such famous names as Johannes Holtfreter and Hilde Mangold. So often one can read turgid and indigestible accounts by historians of science about the past, with speculations as to what a long-since deceased scientist may or may not have meant in his writing. This book by Viktor Ham- burger is an entirely different production. Everything in it is from personal experience, and all current embryologists will be fas- cinated to read of the way experi- ments were planned and results assessed in a laboratory which must surely rank as one of the most pre-eminent in this field in history. I suspect that the reason for the, in my view, great success of this book is that it has been written by a scientist who himself has worked in this field through- out his career and with immense distinction. My only criticism of the book is that Viktor Ham- burger has been too modest about his own achievements, he and Johannes Holtfreter being the two most outstanding and suc- cessful colleagues of Spemann. There are so many parts of great interest in this book that it is hard to single out any one for special comment. To me a point of especial interest was the com- parison of activities in the Spemann laboratory based in Freiburg, FRG with those in another major centre of embryo- logical activity, Woods Hole, Massachusetts. It has always sur- prised me to note that the famous textbook of E. B. Wilson entitled

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.26-0295

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1988-09-01
Volume
26
Issue
01
Pages
26-0295-26-0295
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W3168114271
Cited by
230
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The heritage of experimental embryology: Hans Spemann and the organizer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.26-0295
The paper
The heritage of experimental embryology: Hans Spemann and the organizer. (1988). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.26-0295

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.