The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology
Abstract
The business environment of the 1990s demands significant changes in the way we do business. Simply formulating strategy is no longer sufficient; we must also design the processes to implement it effectively. The key to change is process innovation, a revolutionary new approach that fuses information technology and human resource management to improve business performance. The cornerstone to process innovation's dramatic results is information technology--a largely untapped resource, but a crucial enabler of process innovation. In turn, only a challenge like process innovation affords maximum use of information technology's potential. Davenport provides numerous examples of firms that have succeeded or failed in combining business change and technology initiatives. He also highlights the roles of new organizational structures and human resource programs in developing process innovation. Process innovation is quickly becoming the byword for industries ready to pull their companies out of modest growth patterns and compete effectively in the world marketplace.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design
Schmidt, K., & Simone, C. (1996) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/bf00133655 · Cited by 822
Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges
Berg, M. (2001) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00200-3 · Cited by 715
Gebert, H., Geib, M., Kolbe, L., & Brenner, W. (2003) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270310505421 · Cited by 491
How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility?
Lee, O.-K. (., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0577 · Cited by 447
Enterprise systems and ongoing process change
Davenport, T. H., Harris, J. G., & Cantrell, S. (2004) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150410518301 · Cited by 354
Integrated Decision Support Systems: A data warehousing perspective
March, S. T., & Hevner, A. R. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.029 · Cited by 308
Special Section: Toward a Theory of Business Process Change Management
Kettinger, W. J., & Grover, V. (1995) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1995.11518068 · Cited by 277
Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010 · Cited by 262
A multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems
(2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017458.2017464 · Cited by 259
Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: A contingent resource-based theory view
Sedera, D., Lokuge, S., Grover, V., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.01.001 · Cited by 246
Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes
Pentland, B. T. (1995) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.5.541 · Cited by 233
Is production and operations management a discipline? A citation/co‐citation study
Pilkington, A., & Liston‐Heyes, C. (1999) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579910244188 · Cited by 188
An Analysis of Digital Transformation in the History and Future of Modern Ports
Heilig, L., Schwarze, S., & Voss, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2017.160 · Cited by 177
E-government and organisational transformation of government: Black box revisited?
Nograšek, J., & Vintar, M. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.006 · Cited by 164
Digital innovation ecosystems in agri-food: design principles and organizational framework
Wolfert, S., Verdouw, C., van Wassenaer, L., Dolfsma, W., & Klerkx, L. (2023) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103558 · Cited by 137
Cao, Q., Jones, D. R., & Sheng, H. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.11.007 · Cited by 126
Procurement performance measurement system in the health care industry
Kumar, A., Ozdamar, L., & Peng Ng, C. (2005) · International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance · doi:10.1108/09526860510588179 · Cited by 104
Enterprise modelling: Research review and outlook
Vernadat, F. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103265 · Cited by 92
Identification of problems of implementation of Lean concept in the SME sector
Ulewicz, R., & Kucęba, R. (2016) · Ekonomia i Zarzadzanie · doi:10.1515/emj-2016-0002 · Cited by 52
Five Management Pillars for Digital Transformation Integrating the Lean Thinking Philosophy
Romero, D., Flores, M., Herrera, M., & Resendez, H. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) · doi:10.1109/ice.2019.8792650 · Cited by 51
Organizational adoption of supply chain management system: A multi-theoretic investigation
Cao, Q., Gan, Q., & Thompson, M. A. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.02.003 · Cited by 39
Integration and Generification—Agile Software Development in the Healthcare Market
Johannessen, L. K., & Ellingsen, G. (2009) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-009-9097-8 · Cited by 36
Data Quality: Setting Organizational Policies
Storey, V. C., Dewan, R. M., & Freimer, M. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.004 · Cited by 31
Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste Management and Disposal
Hassan, S. H., Aziz, H. A., Johari, I., & Hung, Y.-T. (2022) · Handbook of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89336-1_3 · Cited by 16
End-user collaboration for process innovation in services: The role of internal resources
Ashok, M., Narula, R., & Martinez-Noya, A. (2014) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20613539 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1993-04-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 30-4486-30-4486
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1605701154
- Cited by
- 4,378
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
