Cited by 822Usability and User Interface DesignInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design

Schmidt, Kjeld, Simone, Carla·1996·Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00133655

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, K., & Simone, C.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Venue
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Published
1996-06
Volume
5
Issue
2-3
Pages
155-200
ISSN
  • 0925-9724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7551
OpenAlex
W2143107436
Cited by
822
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 46
FWCI
33.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
coordination mechanisms, artifacts, collaboration, Ariadne, conceptual framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review