The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mousterian lithic technology: an ecological perspective
Abstract
Human beings depend more on technology than any other animal-the use of tools and weapons is vital to the survival of our species. What processes of biocultural evolution led to this unique dependence? Steven Kuhn turns to the Middle Paleolithic (Mousterian) and to artifacts associated with Neandertals, the most recent human predecessors. His study examines the ecological, economic, and strategic factors that shaped the behaviour of Mousterian tool makers, revealing how these hominids brought technological knowledge to bear on the basic problems of survival. Kuhn's main database consists of assemblages of stone artifacts from four caves and a series of open-air localities situated on the western coast of the Italian peninsula. Variations in the ways stone tools were produced, maintained, and discarded demonstrate how Mousterian hominids coped with the problems of keeping mobile groups supplied with the artifacts and raw materials they used on a daily basis. Changes through time in lithic technology were closely tied to shifting strategies for hunting and collecting food. Some of the most provocative findings of this study stem from observations about the behavioural flexibility of Mousterian populations and the role of planning in foraging and technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Behavioral Ecology and Archaeology
Bird, D. W., & O’Connell, J. F. (2006) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-006-9003-6 · Cited by 296
Shifts in Neandertal mobility, technology and subsistence strategies in western France
Delagnes, A., & Rendu, W. (2011) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.04.007 · Cited by 239
Ahead of the Game: Middle and Upper Palaeolithic Hunting Behaviors in the Southern Caucasus
Adler, D. S., Bar‐Oz, G., Belfer‐Cohen, A., & Bar‐Yosef, O. (2006) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/432455 · Cited by 211
Ruebens, K. (2013) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.06.009 · Cited by 112
Brantingham, P. J. (2006) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/503062 · Cited by 111
Hunting behavior and Neanderthal adaptability in the Late Pleistocene site of Pech-de-l’Azé I
Rendu, W. (2010) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.01.037 · Cited by 105
Terrain difficulty as a factor in raw material procurement in the middle palaeolithic of France
Wilson, L. (2007) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1179/009346907791071539 · Cited by 34
Wood, B. M., & Wood, Z. J. (2006) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.644376 · Cited by 32
Moncel, M.-H., Fernandes, P., Willmes, M., James, H., & Grün, R. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214925 · Cited by 31
Evaluating inputs to models of hominin raw material selection: map resolution and path choices
Browne, C. L., & Wilson, L. (2013) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.05.012 · Cited by 21
Lucero, G. F., Castro, S. C., & Cortegoso, V. (2021) · Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103026 · Cited by 13
MASSIGOGE, A., & PAL, N. (2011) · Revista Española de Antropología Americana · doi:10.5209/rev_reaa.2011.v41.n1.3 · Cited by 6
Massigoge, A., Rafuse, D. J., Rodríguez, J. M., Torino, R. F., & Favier Dubois, C. M. (2021) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-021-01314-3 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1995-11-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 33-1608-33-1608
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2052444201
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.