The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality Health Outcomes Model
Abstract
Purpose: Donabedian's 1966 framework of structure, process, and outcome has guided three decades of study in the United States of the elements needed to evaluate and compare medical care quality. Donabedian's perspective was essentially linear, assuming that structures affect processes, which in turn affect outcomes. Patient characteristics are sometimes considered as mediating outcomes and clinical interventions are considered to be processes. A model is presented in the following article that relates multiple factors affecting quality of care to desired outcomes. It extends previous models by positing dynamic relationships with indicators that not only act upon, but reciprocally affect the various components. Scope and Sources: The proposed model was derived from a synthesis of the authors' experience in quality of care practice and research, as well as selected previous theories. Conclusions: The quality health outcomes model is sufficiently broad (a) to guide development of databases for quality improvement and outcomes management, (b) to suggest key variables in clinical intervention research, and (c) to provide a framework for outcomes research and outcomes management that compares not only treatment options, but organizational or system level interventions. The model also has several policy implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating the quality of medical care
DONABEDIAN, A. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x · Cited by 6,102
Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
Donabedian, A. (1966) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3348969 · Cited by 4,312
Wilson, I. B. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520250075037 · Cited by 3,027
Lower Medicare Mortality Among a Set of Hospitals Known for Good Nursing Care
Aiken, L. H., Smith, H. L., & Lake, E. T. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199408000-00002 · Cited by 809
Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-1551 · Cited by 758
The Performance of Intensive Care Units: Does Good Management Make a Difference?
Shortell, S. M., Zimmerman, J. E., Rousseau, D. M., Gillies, R. R., Wagner, D. P., Draper, E. A., Kanus, W. A., & Duffy, J. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199405000-00009 · Cited by 733
Hospital Characteristics and Mortality Rates
Hartz, A. J., Krakauer, H., Kuhn, E. M., Young, M., Jacobsen, S. J., Gay, G., Muenz, L., Katzoff, M., Bailey, R. C., & Rimm, A. A. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198912213212506 · Cited by 513
Nursing staff in hospitals and nursing homes: is it adequate?
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-2784 · Cited by 185
Adverse Outcomes and Variations in Organization of Care Delivery
Mitchell, P. H., & Shortell, S. M. (1997) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199711001-00003 · Cited by 160
Self-citationEffects of a geriatric nurse practitioner on process and outcome of nursing home care.
Kane, R. L., Garrard, J. M., Skay, C. L., Radosevich, D. M., Buchanan, J. L., McDermott, S., Arnold, S. B., & Kepferle, L. (1989) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.79.9.1271 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Development of a framework for person‐centred nursing
McCormack, B., & McCance, T. V. (2006) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04042.x · Cited by 1,121
Nurse Burnout and Patient Satisfaction
Vahey, D. C., Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., Clarke, S. P., & Vargas, D. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000109126.50398.5a · Cited by 977
Relationship between nurse burnout, patient and organizational outcomes: Systematic review
Jun, J., Ojemeni, M. M., Kalamani, R., Tong, J., & Crecelius, M. L. (2021) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103933 · Cited by 606
Effects of nurse work environment on job dissatisfaction, burnout, intention to leave
Nantsupawat, A., Kunaviktikul, W., Nantsupawat, R., Wichaikhum, O. ‐., Thienthong, H., & Poghosyan, L. (2017) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.12342 · Cited by 374
Nurse Staffing In Hospitals: Is There A Business Case For Quality?
Needleman, J., Buerhaus, P. I., Stewart, M., Zelevinsky, K., & Mattke, S. (2006) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.204 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, P. H., Ferketich, S., Jennings, B. M., & American Academy of Nursing Expert Panel on Quality Health Care
- Venue
- Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-46
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 0743-5150
- OpenAlex
- W2013841743
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 14.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality Health Outcomes Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01234.x
- The paper
- Mitchell, P. H., Ferketich, S., Jennings, B. M., & American Academy of Nursing Expert Panel on Quality Health Care. (1998). Quality Health Outcomes Model. Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01234.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.