The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics
Abstract
This work describes research questions for which the statistic is most appropriate, the underlying assumptions and rationale of the analysis, and the logic behind interpreting the results. It is designed to clarify each statistic's logic and utility rather than teach applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282485 · Cited by 2,454
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015 · Cited by 1,057
Estrada, M., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-04-0066 · Cited by 507
Social Network Types Among Older Adults: A Multidimensional Approach
Fiori, K. L., Smith, J., & Antonucci, T. C. (2007) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/62.6.p322 · Cited by 420
Association between Facebook addiction, self-esteem and life satisfaction: A cross-sectional study
Błachnio, A., Przepiorka, A., & Pantic, I. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.026 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2001-05-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 38-5067-38-5067
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2049805697
- Cited by
- 1,125
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.38-5067
- The paper
- Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. (2001). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-5067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
