The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Unequal chances: family background and economic success
Abstract
Is United States the land of equal opportunity or is playing field tilted in favor of those whose parents are wealthy, well educated, and white? If family background is important in getting ahead, why? And if processes that transmit economic status from parent to child are unfair, could public policy address problem? Unequal Chances provides new answers to these questions by leading economists, sociologists, biologists, behavioral geneticists, and philosophers. New estimates show that intergenerational inequality in United States is far greater than was previously thought. Moreover, while inheritance of wealth and better schooling typically enjoyed by children of well-to-do contribute to this process, these two standard explanations fail to explain extent of intergenerational status transmission. The genetic inheritance of IQ is even less important. Instead, parent-offspring similarities in personality and behavior may play an important role. Race contributes to process, and intergenerational mobility patterns of African Americans and European Americans differ substantially.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research
Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J., & Meaney, M. J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2897 · Cited by 1,409
The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children
Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2007) · Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00359.x · Cited by 1,217
The economics, technology, and neuroscience of human capability formation.
Heckman, J. J. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701362104 · Cited by 1,042
Social and Economic Returns to College Education in the United States
Hout, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102503 · Cited by 943
Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States: an Intergenerational Perspective*
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Jones, M. R., & Porter, S. R. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz042 · Cited by 842
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 42-6612-42-6612
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1545014524
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unequal chances: family background and economic success. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.42-6612
- The paper
- Unequal chances: family background and economic success. (2005). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-6612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.