The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gender differences in mathematics: an integrative psychological approach
Abstract
Preface 1. Research on the women and mathematics issue: a personal case history Susan Chipman 2. The perseverative search for sex differences in mathematic ability Paula Caplan and Jeremy Caplan 3. A psychobiosocial model: why females are sometimes > and sometimes < males in math achievement Diane Halpern, Jonathan Wai and Amanda Saw 4. Gender differences in math: cognitive processes in an expanded framework James Byrnes 5. Cognitive contributions to sex differences in math performance James M. Royer and Laura M. Garofoli 6. Spatial ability as a mediator of gender differences on mathematics tests: a biological-environmental framework M. Beth Casey, Ronald Nuttal and Elizabeth Pezaris 7. Examining gender-related differential item functioning using insights from psychometric and multicontext theory Rob Ibarra 8. The gender-gap artifact: women's underperformance in quantitative domains through the lens of stereotype threat Paul Davies and Steve Spencer 9. 'Math is hard!' (Barbie, 1994): responses of threat vs challenge mediated arousal of stereotypes alleging intellectual inferiority Talia Ben Zee, Cristina M. Carrasquillo, Alison M. L. Ching, Tattiya J. Kliengklom, Kristen L. McDonald, Daniel C. Newhall, Gillian E. Patton, Tiffany D. Stewart, Tonya Stoddard, Michael Inzlicht and Steve Fein 10. The role of ethnicity on the gender gap in mathematics Alyssa Walters and Lisa Brown 11. The gender gap in mathematics: merely a step function Sophia Catsambis 12. 'I can, but I don't want to': the impact of parents, interests, and activities on gender differences in math Janis E. Jacobs, Pamela Davis-Kean, Martha Bleeker, Jacquelynne S. Eccles and Oksana Malachuk 13. Gender effects on mathematics achievement: mediating role of state and trait self-regulation Eunsook Hong, Harold O'Neil and David Feldon 14. Gender differences in mathematics self efficacy beliefs Frank Pajares 15. Integrative conclusion Ann Gallagher and James Kaufman.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018053 · Cited by 1,630
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021385 · Cited by 1,050
Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014412 · Cited by 957
New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021276 · Cited by 920
The Role of Parents and Teachers in the Development of Gender-Related Math Attitudes
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2 · Cited by 849
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 43-1619-43-1619
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1640731893
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender differences in mathematics: an integrative psychological approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-1619
- The paper
- Gender differences in mathematics: an integrative psychological approach. (2005). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.