Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 701

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Educating engineers: designing for the future of the field

·2009·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Foreword. Acknowledgments. About the Authors. Introduction. PART ONE Preparing the New-Century Engineer. Chapter 1: The New-Century Engineer. Chapter 2: Technical Knowledge and Linear Components. Chapter 3: A Historical Curriculum in a New Era. PART TWO A Foundation to Build On. Chapter 4: Knowing That and Knowing How. Chapter 5: Listening, Seeing, Doing. Chapter 6: Learning for Problem Solving. PART THREE A Place to Explore. Chapter 7: Theory and Skills. Chapter 8: Lab in the Curriculum. Chapter 9: Learning in the Lab. Chapter 10: Lab Reports. Chapter 11: Making a Place to Explore Professional Practice. PART FOUR A Way to Create. Chapter 12: Knowing To. Chapter 13: Project-Centered Learning. Chapter 14: Assessing Design. Chapter 15: Making a Place to Create. PART FIVE Affecting the World. Chapter 16: A Foundation for Professional Practice. Chapter 17: Findings from the Study: An Uneven Base. Chapter 18: Preparing for New-Century Professional Practice. PART SIX Bringing Professional Practice Forward. Chapter 19: A Design for Action. Chapter 20: Usable Knowledge. Chapter 21: Toward a New Model for Engineering Education. Chapter 22: Getting from Here to There. Appendix: About the Study. References. Index.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.47-0304

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 701

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2009-09-01
Volume
47
Issue
01
Pages
47-0304-47-0304
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W578996322
Cited by
701
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educating engineers: designing for the future of the field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.47-0304
The paper
Educating engineers: designing for the future of the field. (2009). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-0304

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.