The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relational being: beyond self and community
Abstract
How should I describe myself to you at this moment?You would scarcely be surprised if I told you that I am now at my desk, absorbed in thought.I entertain an idea, consider its shortcomings, play with another, extend its possibilities, and slowly I am moved to write.I try fi tfully to transform these fl eeting states of mind into words, hoping that these pages will allow you, the reader, to understand my thoughts.Doesn't this sound quite reasonable?Consider again: How does this commonplace passage defi ne me as a writer?And in defi ning me, what does it tell us about our conceptions of being human?In important respects, we fi nd here a picture of me as an individual thinker, dwelling in an interior world of consciousness that is all my own.And by implication, isn't this to say that we are each alone in our inner worlds?We have no direct access to each other's thoughts, and it is often diffi cult to translate thoughts into words.It is a world in which you can never plumb the depths of my mind; you will never fully understand me.And too, your private world will always be a mystery to me.In effect, this common account is one that defi nes us in terms of alienated beings."So what," you may respond."It is simply a fact that we are separate individuals, each living in a private consciousness.That's just life."Or is it?If we accept this view of ourselves as bounded beings, the essential "me" dwelling behind the eyeballs, then we must continuously confront issues of separation.I must always be on guard, lest others see the faults in my
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Busfield, J., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/588840 · Cited by 3,813
Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline
Glăveanu, V.-P. (2007) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v3i4.416 · Cited by 1,432
Thinking through cultures—Expeditions in cultural psychology
D'Ardenne, P. (1992) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(92)90019-d · Cited by 764
The Social Construction of Mind: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Linguistic Philosophy
Drew, P., & Coulter, J. (1980) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/589384 · Cited by 102
Cited by
Cunliffe, A. L., & Eriksen, M. (2011) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726711418388 · Cited by 594
Relational recovery: beyond individualism in the recovery approach
Price-Robertson, R., Obradovic, A., & Morgan, B. (2017) · Advances in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/18387357.2016.1243014 · Cited by 344
Care and Possibility: Enacting an Ethic of Care Through Narrative Practice
Lawrence, T. B., & Maitlis, S. (2012) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0466 · Cited by 260
Social mindfulness: skill and will to navigate the social world.
Van Doesum, N. J., Van Lange, D. A. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032540 · Cited by 241
Being well together: individual subjective and community wellbeing
Atkinson, S., Bagnall, A.-M., Corcoran, R., South, J., & Curtis, S. (2020) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00146-2 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 47-2290-47-2290
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1537642897
- Cited by
- 1,436
- References
- 4
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relational being: beyond self and community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.47-2290
- The paper
- Relational being: beyond self and community. (2009). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-2290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.