The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The accidental guerrilla: fighting small wars in the midst of a big one
Abstract
David Kilcullen is one of world's most influential experts counterinsurgency and modern warfare, a ground-breaking theorist whose ideas are revolutionizing military thinking throughout west (Washington Post). Indeed, his vision of modern warfare powerfully influenced America's decision to rethink its military strategy in Iraq and implement the Surge, now recognized as a dramatic success. In The Accidental Guerrilla, Kilcullen provides a remarkably fresh perspective Terror. Kilcullen takes us on ground to uncover face of modern warfare, illuminating both big global war (the War Terrorism) and its relation to associated small across globe: Iraq, Afghanistan, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistani tribal zones, East Timor and horn of Africa. Kilcullen sees today's conflicts as a complex interweaving of contrasting trends--local insurgencies seeking autonomy caught up in a broader pan-Islamic campaign--small wars in midst of a big one. He warns that America's actions in war terrorism have tended to conflate these trends, blurring distinction between local and global struggles and thus enormously complicating our challenges. Indeed, US had done a poor job of applying different tactics to these very different situations, continually misidentifying insurgents with limited aims and legitimate grievances--whom he calls accidental guerrillas--as part of a coordinated worldwide terror network. We must learn how to disentangle these strands, develop strategies that deal with global threats, avoid local conflicts where possible, and win them where necessary. Colored with gripping battlefield experiences that range from jungles and highlands of Southeast Asia to mountains of Afghanistan-Pakistan border to dusty towns of Middle East, The Accidental Guerrilla will, quite simply, change way we think about war. This book is a must read for everyone concerned about war terror.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime: A Survey Experiment in Afghanistan
LYALL, J., BLAIR, G., & IMAI, K. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055413000403 · Cited by 527
Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model.
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2017) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000062 · Cited by 522
Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counterterrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans
Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A. Z. (2010) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00405.x · Cited by 370
Who Takes the Blame? The Strategic Effects of Collateral Damage
Condra, L. N., & Shapiro, J. N. (2012) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00542.x · Cited by 297
Everton, S. F. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139136877 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2010-02-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 47-3441-47-3441
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1608568265
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The accidental guerrilla: fighting small wars in the midst of a big one. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.47-3441
- The paper
- The accidental guerrilla: fighting small wars in the midst of a big one. (2010). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-3441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.