The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simulation and similarity: using models to understand the world
Abstract
Contents Preface 1 Introduction 1.1 Two Aquatic Puzzles 1.2 Models of Modeling 2 Three Kinds of Models 2.1 Concrete Model: The San Francisco Bay-Delta Model 2.2 Mathematical Model: Lotka-Volterra Model 2.3 Computational Model: Schelling's Segregation Model 2.4 Common Features of these Models 2.5 Only Three Types of Models? 2.6 Fewer Than Three Types of Model? 3 The Anatomy of Models: Structure & Construal 3.1 Structure 3.1.1 Concrete Structures 3.1.2 Mathematical 3.1.3 Computational 3.2 Model Descriptions 3.3 Construal 3.4 Representational Capacity of Structures 4 Fictions and Folk Ontology 4.1 Against Maths: Individuation, Causes, and Face Value Practice 4.2 A Simple Fictions Account 4.3 Enriching the Simple Account 4.3.1 Waltonian Fictionalism 4.3.2 Fictions without Models 4.4 Why I am not a Fictionalist 4.4.1 Variation 4.4.2 Representational Capacity of Different Models 4.4.3 Making Sense of Modeling 4.4.4 Variation in Practice 4.5 Folk ontology 4.6 Maths, Interpretation, and Folk Ontology 5 Target Directed Modeling 5.1 Model Development 5.2 Analysis of the Model 5.2.1 Complete Analysis 5.2.2 Goal-directed Analysis 5.3 Model/Target Comparison 5.3.1 Phenomena and Target Systems 5.3.2 Establishing the fit between Model and Target 5.3.3 Representations of Targets 6 Idealization 6.1 Three Kinds of Idealization 6.1.1 Galilean idealization 6.1.2 Minimalist idealization 6.1.3 Multiple Models Idealization 6.2 Representational Ideals and Fidelity Criteria 6.2.1 Completeness 6.2.2 Simplicity 6.2.3 1-Causal 6.2.4 Maxout 6.2.5 P-General 6.3 Idealization and Representational Ideals 6.4 Idealization and Target Directed Modeling 7 Modeling Without a Specific Target 7.1 Generalized Modeling 7.1.1 How Possibly Explanations 7.1.2 Minimal Models and First Order Causal Structures 7.2 Hypothetical Modeling 7.2.1 Contingent Non-existence: xDNA 7.2.2 Impossible Targets: Infinite Population Growth and Perpetual Motion 7.3 Targetless Modeling 7.4 A Moving Target: The Case of Three-sex Biology 8 An Account of Similarity 8.1 Desiderata for Model/World Relations 8.2 Model Theoretic Accounts 8.3 Similarity 8.4 Tversky's Contrast Account 8.5 Attributes and Mechanisms 8.6 Feature Sets, Construals, and Target Systems 8.7 Modeling Goals and Weighting Parameters 8.8 Weighting Function and Background Theory 8.9 Satisfying the Desiderata 9 Robustness Analysis and Idealization 9.1 Levins and Wimsatt on Robustness 9.2 Finding Robust Theorems 9.3 Three Kinds of Robustness 9.3.1 Parameter Robustness 9.3.2 Structural Robustness 9.3.3 Representational Robustness 9.4 Robustness and Confirmation 10 Conclusion: The Practice of Modeling References
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hutchinson, B., Smart, A., Hanna, A., Denton, R., Greer, C., Kjartansson, O., Barnes, P., & Mitchell, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445918 · Cited by 279
The Nature of Physical Computation
Shagrir, O. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197552384.001.0001 · Cited by 70
The multiple, interacting levels of cognitive systems (MILCS) perspective on group cognition
Goldstone, R. L., & Theiner, G. (2017) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2017.1295635 · Cited by 31
An Inferential Account of Model Explanation
Fang, W. (2019) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-018-9958-9 · Cited by 20
“Learning by Thinking” in Science and in Everyday Life
Lombrozo, T. (2020) · The Scientific Imagination · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190212308.003.0010 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2013-08-20
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 51-0251-51-0251
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W380289026
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation and similarity: using models to understand the world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.51-0251
- The paper
- Simulation and similarity: using models to understand the world. (2013). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-0251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.