Cited by 16Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentPublic Health Policies and Education

A Tool for Rating Chronic Disease Prevention and Public Health Interventions

Open access
Kelly, Cheryl, Scharff, Darcell, LaRose, Jessi, Dougherty, Nikole Lobb, Hessel, Amy Stringer, Brownson, Ross C.·2013·Preventing Chronic Disease

Abstract

Bridging the gap between research and practice requires more than evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in controlled studies. To bridge this gap, evidence needs to be defined in different ways, and opportunities need to be provided for practice-based evidence to be replicated and disseminated. Community-based interventions are often not conducted or evaluated in controlled settings, yet they provide more real-world context and have the potential to have a greater effect on population health than findings from controlled studies that are limited in generalizability. The purpose of this article is to describe an approach to identify community-based programs and interventions that have the potential for replication and dissemination. In our study, such interventions met criteria in 3 primary domains: innovativeness, effectiveness, and sustainability. The criteria and tool developed were applied to 2 obesity-prevention programs to demonstrate the usefulness of the tool for identifying potential programs for replication and dissemination, contributing to practice-based evidence. Funders, practitioners, and researchers can apply these criteria to identify programs, environmental changes, or policies that may be replicated and disseminated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5888/pcd10.130173

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, C., Scharff, D., LaRose, J., Dougherty, N. L., Hessel, A. S., & Brownson, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • Missouri Foundation for Health (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Cheryl
Venue
Preventing Chronic Disease
Published
2013-12-12
Volume
10
Pages
E206-E206
ISSN
1545-1151 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130140706
Cited by
16
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Preventing Chronic Disease (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092950)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
practice-based evidence, community-based intervention, chronic disease prevention, public health interventions, obesity prevention programs, program effectiveness, program sustainability, research-practice gap
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Community Health Services, Health Promotion, Humans, Public Health, Program Evaluation, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review