Cited by 22Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Examination of sustainability indicators for fall prevention strategies in three states

Smith, Matthew Lee, Durrett, Nicholas K., Schneider, Ellen C., Byers, Imani N., Shubert, Tiffany E., Wilson, Ashley D., Towne, Samuel D., Ory, Marcia G.·2018·Evaluation and Program Planning

Abstract

With 1-in-4 older adults suffering a fall each year, fall prevention efforts have emerged as a public health priority. Multi-level, evidence-based fall prevention programs have been promoted by the CDC and other government agencies. To ensure participants and communities receive programs' intended benefits, organizations must repeatedly deliver the programs over time and plan for program sustainability as part of 'scaling up' the initiative. The State Falls Prevention Project (SFPP) began in 2011 when the CDC provided 5 years of funding to State Departments of Health in Colorado, New York, and Oregon to simultaneously implement four fall prevention strategies: 1) Tai Chi: Moving for Better Balance; 2) Stepping On; 3) Otago Exercise Program; and 4) STEADI (STopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) toolkit. Surveys were performed to examine systems change and perceptions about sustainability across states. The purposes of this study were to: 1) examine how funding influenced the capacity for program implementation and sustainability within the SFPP; and 2) assess reported Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) scores to learn about how best to sustain fall preventing efforts after funding ends. Data showed that more organizations offered evidence-based fall prevention programs in participants' service areas with funding, and the importance of programming implementation, evaluation, and reporting efforts were likely to diminish once funding concluded. Participants' reported PSAT scores about perceived sustainability capacity did not directly align with previously reported perceptions about PSAT domain importance or modifiability. Findings suggest the importance of grantees to identify potential barriers and enablers influencing program sustainability during the planning phase of the programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.02.001

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, M. L., Durrett, N. K., Schneider, E. C., Byers, I. N., Shubert, T. E., Wilson, A. D., Towne, S. D., & Ory, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Matthew Lee
Venue
Evaluation and Program Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
68
Pages
194-201
ISSN
0149-7189 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794128793
Cited by
22
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation and Program Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1U48-DP005017)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention and Cooperative Agreement (1U48 DP001924)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
fall prevention, program sustainability, scale-up, older adults, Tai Chi, Otago exercise program, systemic change, barriers and facilitators, health departments, Colorado, New York, Oregon
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Financing, Government, Health Promotion, Humans, Politics, Public Health, State Government, United States, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review