Cited by 14Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationDigital Mental Health InterventionsPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Internet-based interventions for pain management: A systematic review of randomised controlled trial (RCTs) conducted from 2010 to 2014

Open access
Ashraf, El Metwally·2015·Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology

Abstract

Limited access to pain management programs was identified as one of the hindering factors in pain treatment. Several internet-based interventions have been developed to improve accessibility. A systematic review of trials of such programs in 2010 documented a preliminary promising effect. A PubMed electronic search was used to identify a systematic randomized controlled trail (RCTs) published 1 January, 2010 to 4 November, 2014 that examined the effectiveness of internet-based pain management programs. The methodological vigorousness of trials was assessed by Jadad scoring system. Out of the 20 RCTs, 5 were on chronic pain, 2 were on acute non-specific pain, while 13 were on disease related pain (rheumatological and neurological diseases, burns, post-operative and cancer-related). Most studies had moderate methodological quality and showed consistent results with respect to effectiveness of internet based programs in reduction of pain, improvement in functionality and psychological well-being. Whilst the current systematic review found a significant pain reduction attributed to internet-based pain interventions further, high-quality RCT are needed to confirm such promising findings. Key words: Pain, ache, migraine, sciatica, headache, management, treatment, technology, computer, computer-based, internet, internet-based, web, web-based, virtual.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5897/jphe2014.0702

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous systematic reviews on Web-based interventions for pain concluded that results were promising in terms of pain reduction and improvement of functional and emotional well-being.

    “Overall, their authors concluded that results were promising in terms of pain reduction, and improvement of functional and emotional well-being.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Adams K, Greiner A, Corrigan J (2006). Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Crossing the Quality Chasm: next steps toward a new health care system. Report of a summit: the 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit-a focus on communities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  2. Boulanger A, Clark AJ, Squire P, Cui E, Horbay GLA (2007). Chronic pain in Canada: have we improved our management of chronic non- cancer pain? Pain Research & Management: J. Canadian Pain Soc. 12(1):39.
  3. Lamb SE, Lall RS, Hansen Z, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, Underwood M (2010). A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioral programme for low back pain: the back skills training (BeST) trial. Health Technol. Assessment. 14(41):1-281.
  4. Peng P, Choiniere M, Dion D, Intrater H, LeFort S, Lynch M (2007). STOPPAIN Investigators Group Challenges in accessing multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities in Canada. Canadian J. Anaesthesia 54(12):977-984.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashraf, E. M.
Venue
Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology
Published
2015-05-31
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
170-182
ISSN
2141-2316 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2563664367
Cited by
14
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
online intervention, pain management, chronic pain, cancer pain, postoperative pain, burn pain, neurological pain, analgesia, functionality, psychological well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review