Cited by 6Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsEducational Research and MethodsQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Qualitative research: Defining features and guiding principles

Open access
Alam, Md. Saiful, Asmawi, Adelina·2024·Forum for Education Studies

Abstract

In the present age and time, there has been a research explosion, thus a huge diversity in research and methods. Defining, characterizing, specializing, and isolating major and minor research and methodology diversity is very significant. Qualitative research, for example, is one of two major research approaches. However, what makes qualitative research qualitative or what is qualitative in qualitative research is a crucial question for understanding qualitative research. This is especially true for novices in the field of qualitative research who depart with this fundamental question. Scholarly attention is therefore needed to address this question. Noticeably, there is scanty literature on a substantial overview that captures the unique features of qualitative research. This paper aims to present a literature survey of the defining characteristics and guiding principles of qualitative research. The authors have extensive experience in qualitative research. Based on their review, the paper outlines the commonly shared characteristics of qualitative research. In the current landscape of resulting research diversity, the highlights of the overview of qualitative research in the present paper are particularly pertinent, especially for novice researchers entering the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.59400/fes.v2i2.1262

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23][23]Hancock DR, Algozzine B, and Lim JH. Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. Teachers’ College Press; 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alam, M. S., & Asmawi, A.
Affiliations
  • World University of Bangladesh (BD)
  • University of Malaya (MY)
Venue
Forum for Education Studies
Published
2024-05-21
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
1262
ISSN
3029-2956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4398181032
Cited by
6
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Forum for education studies. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
qualitative research, guiding principles, qualitative versus quantitative research, research methodology diversity, novice researchers, epistemology of qualitative research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review